Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Social Network


fitty76

Recommended Posts

Lol, it does look pretty lame.

Facebook is not ghey, myspace on the other hand....

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks uber-lame. "Hey let's take the story of some nerd(s) who made Facebook and over-glamorize his his life as some sort of baller!"

They admitted that it was a blatant exaggeration and yet this movie will still make money. It kind of disgusts me.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

He's worth a lot but he would have to do a lot to turn that into cash. Facebook wasn't even making a profit for a long time I don't know if they are right now.

His "share" in the company makes him a billionare but he's still not ready to cash out just yet like the google guys did.

Having billions of dollars at that age would rule and suck at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

last time i checked having billions of dollars is pretty baller.

I'm pretty sure most of the events were before they were billionaires.

Umm is there such thing as a movie that doesn't exaggerate? You know, aside from complete fabrications...and documentaries.

It's a movie about some guys who made a website. The exaggeration bothers me in this movie because the actual topic is quite lame. I never said there weren't a lot of other movies I feel are way too exaggerated. Hell, I hardly watch movies and dislike most TV shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wish this was both true and happens. 
    • Cam Jordan was on Good Morning Football.  A player like Cam (lifelong Saint and a great ambassador for any team--I like him a lot) could be used by the Saints to create a smokescreen.  He denied that the Saints would take a QB in the first round, claiming that it has not been done since Manning in 1971 (paraphrasing)... It seems to me, (conspiracy theory forthcoming) that bit of information would have to have been researched/premeditated/planned.  Was he attempting to scoff at the concept that the Saints would draft a QB at #10?  Remember, Carr missed 7 games last year and had a 63.something QB rating.  He was not believed to be returning in 2025.  When the Saints thought that one of the top 2 Qbs were not going to be there at #10, they did not take advantage of the void clause in his contract, the way I understand it.  That means they continued to kick the Carr contract down the road.  In 2026, Carr's cap number is $69m--nearly a quarter of the cap for a 35-year old QB they do not want.  He is to be paid a $40m salary with a $10m roster bonus. While I am not a capologist, it is interesting if they really like Shedeur. All that matters is the perception that the Saints will take him at 10. If the Giants pass on him, and I think they likely will, Sanders could draw interest from the Raiders (I do not see it) at 6 or the Jets at 7 (more likely, but still unlikely).  The Panthers are the most likely trade partner--unless the Jets want to move back.  So who may realistically trade up for a qb?  The Colts (14), but there is no noise about them taking a QB and I do not think they have shown interest--instead, a competition between Richardson and Jones is the plan.  The Steelers (21) are in play, and the Rams are in play.  There is, however, another option for Carolina as a trade partner--The Saints.  A draft day switch for a third rounder might keep the Panthers targeting their player at 8 and add a pick in the process, suggesting they do not want to move back--but I get the impression that the Panthers are looking to move back.  
    • I said this a week ago and someone said it's idiotic basically  bc they want Rodgers. Newsflash,  Rodgers is a 1 year bandaid at most and if he gets hurt, Pittsburgh  has nothing else  but just traded for Metcalf.  I still think Shedaur may go to the Giants tho. Feels its a battle in the front office on him. We will see but I'd gladly take that trade package lol
×
×
  • Create New...