Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty Talking to Jake (Inside the NFL)


PeteRozelle

Recommended Posts

I watched Inside the NFL tonight, and during the highlights of the panthers game it showed Smitty talking to Jake. He basically said...

" I Don't care if you throw 50 Interceptions in a game, you're still my guy."

Not an exact quote, but something very close to that... I'll have to see it again later in the week. Then again maybe not, it was tough to watch.

pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's the nature of the game. your teammates are always going to try to instill confidence in you to keep your chin up and try to mount a comeback. doesn't mean if we ever walked in with a different QB next season that Smitty would get pissed and throw cleats at the wall in the locker room because his guy is not taking snaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched Inside the NFL tonight, and during the highlights of the panthers game it showed Smitty talking to Jake. He basically said...

" I Don't care if you throw 50 Interceptions in a game, you're still my guy."

Not an exact quote, but something very close to that... I'll have to see it again later in the week. Then again maybe not, it was tough to watch.

pete

delhomme responds.....i don't care if your my guy, im going to throw 50 interceptions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we comparing Jake to guys like Manning, Montana, the greatest QBs in the last 20 years?

Manning threw 6 picks or something like that, but he still almost won that game for them near the end, only lost by two points, and considering he chucked it 56 times and Delhomme chucked it 34 times in their games, it doesn't look near as bad.

And come to think of it I don't think Jake could throw 56 passes in a game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we comparing Jake to guys like Manning, Montana, the greatest QBs in the last 20 years?

Manning threw 6 picks or something like that, but he still almost won that game for them near the end, only lost by two points, and considering he chucked it 56 times and Delhomme chucked it 34 times in their games, it doesn't look near as bad.

And come to think of it I don't think Jake could throw 56 passes in a game.

I really doubt that if Jake had actually won us a Super Bowl, and was a HOF caliber QB, that anyone would care if he threw those 5 picks.

Oh but guess what?

He hasn't, and he's not.....................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nah I wanna see these NFL evaluators talking about his prospects at WR aren't good because I would LOVE to see thier explanations 
    • You do realize that raw stats don't make someone a better or worse player, right? To begin with, the last time I checked, 1,319 is more yards than 1,258, so T-Mac had more yards (but I'll forgive you as a typo there and say you meant catches lol), but that's before even factoring in that Hunter did his in 13 games vs 12 for T-Mac because Arizona didn't make a bowl game. It's also completely ignoring the team around each player.  If you think Hunter having the 8th place finisher in the Heisman voting at QB isn't going to result in helping his top WRs stats, then you're sticking your head in the sand to purposefully not see it. Hunter's QB had 353 completions for 4,134 yards and 37 TDs vs T-Mac's QB who had 260 completions for 2,958 yards and 18 TDs. But sure, let's rank NFL prospects by their stats and say the guy with more catches and TDs is the better prospect.  So on that note, I now change my mind, T-Mac is no longer the best WR in the draft, it's Nick Nash who had 104 rec, 1,382 yards, and 16 TDs, all numbers better than Hunter's... because that's how this is done, right? As I've said before, if someone wants to like a player better than someone else that's totally fair, but come with real reasons, talk about their play, but to talk about things like stats as your reasoning, when you ignore the obvious and massive flaws in using those stats in that way, just makes you look dumb.
    • Nah you don't go out and put up the numbers he did without being able to run routes dude is a football junky so he works on his craft he isn’t THAT much more athletic than other players to just be able to go out and do whatever and succeed at that level 
×
×
  • Create New...