Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Excellent point


cookinbrak

Recommended Posts

I wonder who wrote that line for Packer since he know's nothing about sports.

You don't have to know anything about any sport to know that the defense we played vs the Cardinals was probably the worst plan ever for any game in any sport.

A dumb/blind/deaf/retard would have double teamed Fitz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to at least 7 guys on Sunday who can't tell the difference between a 3 point stance and a 3 point play who said the following:

"why did we stop running the ball so soon?"

"that # 11 was always by himself, why did they let that happen?"

"it looked like Carolina just didn't want to win"

All the obvious stuff we have beat into the ground makes this loss so incredibly painful.

Man, at least double cover Fitz and make AZ have to do SOME kind of adjustment.

Just makes me sick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On "PrimeTime" today, Mark Packer said "I'd like to watch the Eagles-Cards game with Fox, just to say 'Hey, look! The Eagles are double teaming Fitzgerald instead of playing a soft zone! Why didn't we try that?'

Forget just having him watch them double Fitz, have him and TGRO watch Philly, Pittsburg, and Baltimore play. Ask them why dont the Panthers play a more aggressive style defense and get rid of this bend dont break crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to at least 7 guys on Sunday who can't tell the difference between a 3 point stance and a 3 point play

So Trgovac, obviously, but who were the other six? :confused:

(uncharacteristically mean of me I know, but I can't imagine another year with him as coordinator; DL coach, maybe, but I like Sunseri there too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The saddest part of this...

Mark Packer and Jim Rome are both idjits who work in jobs their sports knowledge doesn't merit. They are the epitome of style over substance. Frankly, I know ten year olds who have more real football knowledge than either of 'em.

And yet, even they know we should have concentrated our gameplan on stopping Fitzgerald.

At this point, is there anyone other than Mike Trgovac and John Fox that didn't know this prior to Saturday's game? :confused:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The saddest part of this...

Mark Packer and Jim Rome are both idjits who work in jobs their sports knowledge doesn't merit. They are the epitome of style over substance. Frankly, I know ten year olds who have more real football knowledge than either of 'em.

And yet, even they know we should have concentrated our gameplan on stopping Fitzgerald.

At this point, is there anyone other than Mike Trgovac and John Fox that didn't know this prior to Saturday's game? :confused:

Maybe Tim Lewis. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...