Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which receiver should start

jpo287

By jpo287,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

jpo287 Newbie

jpo287

Posted
Posted

Here are the attempts/completions for the receivers through the first two games. Put the names with the numbers:

1. 2/9 22% completion

2. 4/7 57% completion

3. 1/6 16% completion

4. 2/8 25% completion

And the answer NONE is not allowed!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C47 Newbie

C47

Posted
Posted

Here are the attempts/completions for the receivers through the first two games. Put the names with the numbers:

1. 2/9 22% completion

2. 4/7 57% completion

3. 1/6 16% completion

4. 2/8 25% completion

And the answer NONE is not allowed!

Number 2 and it's Dwayne Jarrett....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted

Whomever has the longest yards per completion.

that'd be kenny moore.

I think right now the 3 front runners have to be Moore,Jarrett and Lafell...

I honestly dont know who I'd pick at this point..

also Edwards has as many receptions as Jarrett right now (4) and 8 more yards to show for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Future of the Funchise Mentor

Future of the Funchise

Posted
Posted

fug this thread, fug those statistics, fug all these fake ass #4 recievers fighting to be #2, fug McDonalds, fug Walmart, fug Chicago, Idaho, Ohio, and all the other states in the midwest (especially Wisconsin). fug their cheese, fug dairy all together (makes me gassy), fug Bin Laden, fug you communist tree huggin' p.e.t.a. jerkoffs (animals are for eating), fug Lebron James, fug the NBA, fug the MLB, fug every sport that ain't football, fug soccer twice for trying to be football, rugby's cool, but fug their jerseys.

With that being said. LaFell will start. If not it will be Jarrett then LaFell.

Now please no more "Who's gonna be our #2" threads. Just hop into one of the 50 other before hitting the new thread button.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trucpfan Experienced

trucpfan

Posted
Posted

f**k this thread, f**k those statistics, f**k all these fake ass #4 recievers fighting to be #2, f**k McDonalds, f**k Walmart, f**k Chicago, Idaho, Ohio, and all the other states in the midwest (especially Wisconsin). f**k their cheese, f**k dairy all together (makes me gassy), f**k Bin Laden, f**k you communist tree huggin' p.e.t.a. jerkoffs (animals are for eating), f**k Lebron James, f**k the NBA, f**k the MLB, f**k every sport that ain't football, f**k soccer twice for trying to be football, rugby's cool, but f**k their jerseys.

With that being said. LaFell will start. If not it will be Jarrett then LaFell.

Now please no more "Who's gonna be our #2" threads. Just hop into one of the 50 other before hitting the new thread button.

I have to completely agree with ur response.....poo's gettn out of control with these damn repeat threads disguised as something good to read.....I love that perfect ass avatar my dude......we need more topics....ie our d line went from weak link to the best thing we have seen in a while...(so far)...That coulda been my first thread....hey one day soon I will show you all wack thred starters how to put up valuable info enough back to watchn the network waiting for some GOOD THREADS.....(paging the replacement Latetia)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jpo287 Newbie

jpo287

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Now please no more "Who's gonna be our #2" threads. Just hop into one of the 50 other before hitting the new thread button.

Maybe we should just have stickies for QB, receiver, RB's, defense, etc and just constantly post there. F*ck this starting new threads crap. After all, everything's pretty much already been asked a one time or another here already. Just find the appropriate thread and post there. That way we can have threads 5, 6 even 700 pages long.

And for what it's worth, LeFall has caught all of 1 pass out of 7 attempts (although he has plenty of passes hit his hands). So explain to me why he should start. Or maybe I should just go look up the answer in one of the 50 other threads. I am sure it has already been addressed ad nauseum by now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jpo287 Newbie

jpo287

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I have to completely agree with ur response.....poo's gettn out of control with these damn repeat threads disguised as something good to read.....I love that perfect ass avatar my dude......we need more topics....ie our d line went from weak link to the best thing we have seen in a while...(so far)...That coulda been my first thread....hey one day soon I will show you all wack thred starters how to put up valuable info enough back to watchn the network waiting for some GOOD THREADS.....(paging the replacement Latetia)

Yeah, now there's something original.

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/41790-if-nothing-else-our-d-is-something-to-be-excited-about.html

http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/41771-everette-brown-haters.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      Strange, every news article and tweet I just searched all mentioned waivers. It is definitely his sixth year of at least 6 games. All I was trying to think of earlier was at the vet min could he beat out Bryce in camp next year lol. He's kinda got the old Darnold issue where he can obviously launch deep balls and qb run at a level Bryce will never achieve, but it sounds like he would be content being like a Josh Allen backup who doesn't throw the whole game plan out the window if he has to come in for a series or two. If we had him and for some reason still wanted to start Bryce he would kinda do what Justin Fields was doing the other night with Dangeruss, coming in for designed runs and maybe some play action/triple option rpo things to go deep. That would be so obvious and sad though. At least Russ can still sling it 40 yards in the air with a flick of the wrist
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
×
×
  • Create New...