Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know how to time travel.....

Awesomeness!!

By Awesomeness!!,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Awesomeness!! Newbie

Awesomeness!!

Posted
Posted

Look up at the night sky, hell look at the Sun. YOu're not seeing the sun as it is right now, you're seeing it as it ws 8 or so mins ago. The same for stars in the sky. You're really seeing the star (or how it looked) maybe millions of years ago, depending on the star, because it takes the light so long to rach us. I'm sure you already knew that. Anyway, if you could travel faster than light, say, 100 million times faster than light, and you got in your rocketship, and blasted off, and you're rocket ship was on course to land whereever the Earth was..say 100 years ago, you would travel to the Earth 100 years in the fast. Einstein said that time and space were connected, and since all Space exist right now, all time must also exist right now. Which means, Next week, has already happened.....or, is happening right now we just haven't lived it yet. But that also means the past must be happening right now....if you could just get to it..........

Now all we need is a rocketship that can go 100 million times faster than light..:auto:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Awesomeness!! Newbie

Awesomeness!!

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I've don't think a macroscopic object like a typical space probe or a rocketship could make the trip, but a microscopic object with very...very little mass could. I've always pictured something like that..'riding' on a light beam, but somehow making the light go faster than light by giving it a boost of some sorts. Keep in mind, light does have mass. It pusses on objects when it hits something. Photons have mass, so a microscopic probe of some sorts could ride on a light beam..its possible..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
Posted

Too many assumptions of variables falling into place. I do think it's possible, but not on the terms we have been taught.

I think something outside the rules has to be able to interject to "break" all the rules.

We can only project and assume the outcomes are time travelled has happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
Posted

Nope. On our terms we understand one level. There are levels above ours that we can't comprehend. This fits perfectly into time travel.

To flat out quantify it for our bicameral orbs. We would truly need to meet someone from the future to get it.

My youngest brought this up the other day. Dad, I don't think we would really want to time travel. Why I asked? Because we get older but really because we are better off in the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Razzy Newbie

Razzy

Posted
Posted

wagering.jpg

I don't think it would be physically possible to travel anywhere close to the speed of light, much less FTL. Since energy particles (light) have a wave/particle duality and since matter is merely energy condensed and vibrating and a specific frequency, I have a hunch that accelerating to the speed of light would first cause you to become infinitely massive at the atomic level until your atomic structure would essentially "break" into subatomic particles. Remember, there is no such thing as solid. Things are essentially only held together by magnetic bonds and solid is a result of perception. That kind of speed would only be possible on this level, where something can have both the properties of a particle and a wave; it occupies space but has no mass.

One way might be to manipulate gravity "around" an object by somehow manipulating and accelerating the particles around the object, essentially "pushing" the object on a wave of particles that is less massive in the front and more massive in the rear where they have been accelerated. We don't have this technology, yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WUnderhill
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      Yeah not taking that Burns trade was infinitely stupid. We seem to be finally righting the ship but, imo, our biggest issue since Tepper bought the team has been coaches and management having a poor understanding of where our own roster is at. Starting with that idiot Rhule drinking his own kool-aid and thinking he was going to come and take the NFL by storm with Teddy freaking Bridgewater. Could have just kept Cam on the last year of his contract and gone from there but noooo that fat slob had to feel like he was the big man on campus. First round wizard Marty Hurney who, for whatever his faults, has a freaking HOF track record with first round picks, wants to trade up for Hebert but fat fug Rhule says no. Then we kept Rhule for 3 years which is absolutely unbelievable to me and every single year he treated our roster like it was just one player away trading our draft picks for Sam Darnold and Baker Mayfield who have proven since leaving that Matt Rhule was an even bigger idiot of a coach than we thought. We finally seem to understand we are a ways off and trade CMC, but then we don’t take the actual good trade for Brian Burns who was never better than a run of the mill situational pass rusher. Then we botch the self scout of our OL (and team) after Wilks, even though they were bad before Wilks simplified the scheme, thinking they can execute whatever the hell Reich and Brown were trying to do. So we win a couple meaningless games playing dummy ball and Fitterer thinks we’re a player away again. And nobody even considers that having the slowest receiving corps imaginable with Damiere freaking Byrd, who can’t even make it to the season before being injured and cut, as your only hope for speed, coupled with the worst pass blocking OL I’ve ever seen, might lead to titanic levels of disaster. The way Canales and Morgan have been adamant about constantly bringing competition at every position has been refreshing and made a huge difference. I was kind of worried that we had fallen into our old ways leading up to the draft with all the talk of defense only and worried that they might feel the offense was set. Very glad to see they were not complacent on that. My big thing now is I’m still wondering why Evero is still here. I can’t think of a single player who has gotten better under him, and the Broncos defense got better once he left. We’ll see.
    • rayzor
      NFL Exec Mike North Talks League’s 2025 Schedule Release with Rich Eisen

      By rayzor · Posted

      really good interview that gives some insight into their decision making process in making up the schedules and the issues they run into with so many people broadcasting games now. also some interesting discussion on what they have going on and where they might be heading in the international games. vikings have 2 of them, btw. we might be seeing more of that.     
    • rayzor
      Panthers schedule is out

      By rayzor · Posted

      wow i absolutely LOVED watching that.   will watch again...and again...and again.
×
×
  • Create New...