Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some thoughts.


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

First off 12-4 is a false indicator of this team. Several games (see first Arizona game for example) we lucked out and came back to win. Games like the Saints we almost allowed them to come back and win it.

the problem with this team is a lack of consistency and too much predictability. Jake Delhomme is the walking definition of inconsistency. The whole team is. From week to week we don’t know what team will show up.

Predictability. Arizona looked like it was in our huddle. Hell even Fitzgerald said they could tell what we were going to do and Fox wasn’t going to change it. You just can’t play games like that.

It is time for some coaching changes. Fox needs to change his philosophy of not being willing to make adjustments on the fly, and our DC needs to be shown the door. We have ran this soft Cover 2 crap for long enough. Get someone in here that can take max advantage of what talent we have. Get someone in here that will do like some other teams like Baltimore, Philly, NYG etc that will bring the heat.

As for as Jake Delhomme…I think it’s time to give Moore a good long look. The kid has paid his dues, was trained by one of the best in College. It is time to give the kid a shot.

Lastly, Peppers isn’t worth the money. Franchise him, get a first rounder and more and let’s move on. Look for DL help in Free agency and draft well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off 12-4 is a false indicator of this team. Several games (see first Arizona game for example) we lucked out and came back to win. Games like the Saints we almost allowed them to come back and win it.

.

A record cannot be a false indicator of our season. A win is a win, no matter how you get it. The stomping we gave to the Bucs counts just as much as our last second heart-attack win against New Orleans. If a win doesn't count when you "luck out," then does our loss against NYG not count because they lucked out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off 12-4 is a false indicator of this team. Several games (see first Arizona game for example) we lucked out and came back to win. Games like the Saints we almost allowed them to come back and win it.

the problem with this team is a lack of consistency and too much predictability. Jake Delhomme is the walking definition of inconsistency. The whole team is. From week to week we don’t know what team will show up.

Predictability. Arizona looked like it was in our huddle. Hell even Fitzgerald said they could tell what we were going to do and Fox wasn’t going to change it. You just can’t play games like that.

It is time for some coaching changes. Fox needs to change his philosophy of not being willing to make adjustments on the fly, and our DC needs to be shown the door. We have ran this soft Cover 2 crap for long enough. Get someone in here that can take max advantage of what talent we have. Get someone in here that will do like some other teams like Baltimore, Philly, NYG etc that will bring the heat.

As for as Jake Delhomme…I think it’s time to give Moore a good long look. The kid has paid his dues, was trained by one of the best in College. It is time to give the kid a shot.

Lastly, Peppers isn’t worth the money. Franchise him, get a first rounder and more and let’s move on. Look for DL help in Free agency and draft well.

Well said. Except for Moore, you hit the nail right on the head. He has yet to prove himself in my mind---I think a good portion of Panther fans would agree.

Seems like a consensus on anything is a rare commodity round' these parts. Flamers---flame on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Karlaftis and Danna have been pretty inconsistent so teams have been doubling Jones and able to contain their pass rush.   But the good thing is that yesterday, we schemed well against Steve Spags Defense, Canales married the surrounding personnel with his QB through play designs within his comfort zone and was able to get downfield at will.  He was able to execute higher difficulty throws and look a lot more comfortable.  It tells me that Canales has a good system in mind, and had an edge gameplanning wise against Spagnuolo - which is nice to see.  It's a bit to see-saw at times with either going way too pass heavy or way too run heavy, but I think he's finding out what works.  It takes time to have it come together, and sure, I could see regression happen against a better front-7, but this was good for the entire system gelling.    
    • This was evident first two weeks of season. I don’t see any issues with physical tools since he came back. I think he is a player that must play with confidence to overcome those size limitations and he’s doing that.  
    • Still 3-10 on passes over 15 yards.  At least he's not scared to merely attempt them anymore.  Where I see improvement is the 10-15 yard range.  He was 6-6.  Bryce of old was scatter shot on anything beyond 10 yards and the further out, the worse the accuracy.
×
×
  • Create New...