Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some thoughts.


Highlandfire

Recommended Posts

First off 12-4 is a false indicator of this team. Several games (see first Arizona game for example) we lucked out and came back to win. Games like the Saints we almost allowed them to come back and win it.

the problem with this team is a lack of consistency and too much predictability. Jake Delhomme is the walking definition of inconsistency. The whole team is. From week to week we don’t know what team will show up.

Predictability. Arizona looked like it was in our huddle. Hell even Fitzgerald said they could tell what we were going to do and Fox wasn’t going to change it. You just can’t play games like that.

It is time for some coaching changes. Fox needs to change his philosophy of not being willing to make adjustments on the fly, and our DC needs to be shown the door. We have ran this soft Cover 2 crap for long enough. Get someone in here that can take max advantage of what talent we have. Get someone in here that will do like some other teams like Baltimore, Philly, NYG etc that will bring the heat.

As for as Jake Delhomme…I think it’s time to give Moore a good long look. The kid has paid his dues, was trained by one of the best in College. It is time to give the kid a shot.

Lastly, Peppers isn’t worth the money. Franchise him, get a first rounder and more and let’s move on. Look for DL help in Free agency and draft well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off 12-4 is a false indicator of this team. Several games (see first Arizona game for example) we lucked out and came back to win. Games like the Saints we almost allowed them to come back and win it.

.

A record cannot be a false indicator of our season. A win is a win, no matter how you get it. The stomping we gave to the Bucs counts just as much as our last second heart-attack win against New Orleans. If a win doesn't count when you "luck out," then does our loss against NYG not count because they lucked out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off 12-4 is a false indicator of this team. Several games (see first Arizona game for example) we lucked out and came back to win. Games like the Saints we almost allowed them to come back and win it.

the problem with this team is a lack of consistency and too much predictability. Jake Delhomme is the walking definition of inconsistency. The whole team is. From week to week we don’t know what team will show up.

Predictability. Arizona looked like it was in our huddle. Hell even Fitzgerald said they could tell what we were going to do and Fox wasn’t going to change it. You just can’t play games like that.

It is time for some coaching changes. Fox needs to change his philosophy of not being willing to make adjustments on the fly, and our DC needs to be shown the door. We have ran this soft Cover 2 crap for long enough. Get someone in here that can take max advantage of what talent we have. Get someone in here that will do like some other teams like Baltimore, Philly, NYG etc that will bring the heat.

As for as Jake Delhomme…I think it’s time to give Moore a good long look. The kid has paid his dues, was trained by one of the best in College. It is time to give the kid a shot.

Lastly, Peppers isn’t worth the money. Franchise him, get a first rounder and more and let’s move on. Look for DL help in Free agency and draft well.

Well said. Except for Moore, you hit the nail right on the head. He has yet to prove himself in my mind---I think a good portion of Panther fans would agree.

Seems like a consensus on anything is a rare commodity round' these parts. Flamers---flame on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...