Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

why was gamble not on fitzgerald?


stopncrank

Recommended Posts

anyone have thoughts on the sceme for the defense against the cards. gamble is easily our best corner, why not put him on l.f. ? everyone on here is bashing jake to no end, but i have more of a problem with what the defense didn't do. was this john fox's call or turgo's? fitzgerald is quoted in our local paper as saying "carolina really doesn't change it's schemes". for a defense that is supposedly so complex, it sounds to me like arizona knew what was coming at them before it got there. why not double team fitzgerald and try to get somebody else to beat you? they dropped back into zone so many times i lost count. anybody else see this or was it just me? does turgo even adjust? who knows, i'm no expert but how long are the powers that be gonna allow underacheiving on defense? with the talen on this team they should easily be a top 3 defense. sorry for the rant, please take it easy on me i'm a newbie. i just think that for all the jake bashing thats going on here, the qb situation is not as big a problem as our d giving up 30 ppg the last 3-or 4 games. your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because John Fox doesn't like to let the offense dictate what we do, he just likes to sit back and get owned.

He broke this tendency one time a few years ago by putting Lucas on Fitzgerald in the second half and Lucas shadowed him, and pretty much shut him down. Apparently he forgot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if this was the case but lots of times teams will put there best corner one on one with the #2 reciever and roll double coverage to the #1 reciever. Fitz reminds me of Smith. There were 2 guys near him when he made those catches. He just beat double coverage. 30 points really isn't that bad considering the 6 turnovers gave them 6 more possessions. Arizona averages 24 points on the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm wondering why the still have Lucas as the 2nd CB. He really got tourched the last month, maybe he's tired from age, but JC. I think Marshall is better than Lucas at this point, although Marshall had a ridiculouslly stupid penatly against him the other night. How many penatlites did we end up with anyway, 20?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^^^ yep

On a couple of the big plays Fitz would line up in the slot on Gamble's side. When Chris would fall back to his @#$@#@$$#$%%^ zone, Fitz would literally run across the whole field and sit down behind the zone on the opposite side of the field. This would essentially overload one side of the field. Safties have half the field and will not cross over to help out. That looooooong crossing route left three recievers on two zone playing defensive backs. The only hope of defending that play was to have one of our linebackers cover Fitz through his zone. Fat chance of that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care what scheme they used, the fact of the matter is Fitz should have gotten his ass busted at the line of scrimmage every time he lined up, no questions asked.

Somebody should have been assigned to stick with him like glue, and busting his ass, and getting him off his route was of the utmost importance, but that is just to easy to game plan around, or actually execute.

One of the dumbest mistakes ever by our coaching staff for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care what scheme they used, the fact of the matter is Fitz should have gotten his ass busted at the line of scrimmage every time he lined up, no questions asked.

Somebody should have been assigned to stick with him like glue, and busting his ass, and getting him off his route was of the utmost importance, but that is just to easy to game plan around, or actually execute.

One of the dumbest mistakes ever by our coaching staff for sure.

The last time I remember us playing man to man was when Ricky Manning Jr. had multiple picks against Philly in the playoffs 1000 years ago. (at least it seems like 1000 years ago).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this in another post. Why the hell wasn't someone not laying Fitz out on the line at the beginning of the plays? At least press him and push him off the route!

In Turgs scheme we always start off about 7 to 8 yards deep and play cover two. That scheme has it's place. It unfortunately is not a viable every down every play defensive scheme. Ever wonder why other teams convert an unusually high rate of third downs? We give them the short routes by playing 8 yards of the line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, although it looks more like they are playing 10 yards deep. It seems either Turgs doesn't trust the CB's enough to let them hit up on the line or he is so freakin scared of getting beat deep that he is willing to give up 7+ yards on every single pass play. It sickens me how easily teams can pass against us, especially those short routes where they get a effin first down every other play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...