Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Black Ops Multiplayer

Britneck

By Britneck,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Britneck Newbie

Britneck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Battlefield 3

...Just sayin

... Frostbite Engine 2.0

Ok let me get this straight. You won't play a game because of a remote control car that you can use once and you have to earn it but you will play a game that has a UAV you can fly around that spams missles or has a machine gun on it that you dont even have to work for? How is that any different than the remote control car? Other than the UAV can last all day cause you can fly it into space where no one can reach it and if they do you can always just bring it back down and have someone repair it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Ok let me get this straight. You won't play a game because of a remote control car that you can use once and you have to earn it but you will play a game that has a UAV you can fly around that spams missles or has a machine gun on it that you dont even have to work for? How is that any different than the remote control car? Other than the UAV can last all day cause you can fly it into space where no one can reach it and if they do you can always just bring it back down and have someone repair it.

Jeez, do you work for Treyarch? You're a tad defensive.

I said the RC car was reason #127 I wouldn't be buying that game. The RC car ain't the only reason. I've got more.

And I don't think I've ever been killed by the UAV in BFBC2 (although I've done my share of killin' with em). If you fly into space and spam you're not going to hit anything anyway. The missiles are useless unless you're aiming at a structure or a camper. And they are still insignificant compared to the annoying airstrikes, cruise missiles, helicopters, gunships, harriers, stationary guns and other ridiculous unmanned weapons that exist in MW2 (which kill me dozens of times per day). Plus you can shoot down a UAV with a rifle. Good luck taking out a chopper like that. The RC car is just another fish in a very annoying noob sea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Britneck Newbie

Britneck

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Jeez, do you work for Treyarch? You're a tad defensive.

I said the RC car was reason #127 I wouldn't be buying that game. The RC car ain't the only reason. I've got more.

And I don't think I've ever been killed by the UAV in BFBC2 (although I've done my share of killin' with em). If you fly into space and spam you're not going to hit anything anyway. The missiles are useless unless you're aiming at a structure or a camper. And they are still insignificant compared to the annoying airstrikes, cruise missiles, helicopters, gunships, harriers, stationary guns and other ridiculous unmanned weapons that exist in MW2 (which kill me dozens of times per day). Plus you can shoot down a UAV with a rifle. Good luck taking out a chopper like that. The RC car is just another fish in a very annoying noob sea.

Im not upset at all. I think you need to relax a bit guy. Im just talking about the games. Do you work for the battlefield people? That dumb comment can go both ways. I'm just trying to figure out why you guys hate so much. The main things I've heard are perks, kill streaks, camping, and paying for maps. Battlefield has perks. Battlefield doesn't have kill streaks but they have choppers, tanks, and uavs. Snipers get mortars just for camping for 30 seconds. The big thing everyone said about getting this game is because people don't camp in it and everyone works together on it. That is a load poo. I was getting into matches all the time where everyone is sniping. You can't even get near the objective because you can only be on a team of 4 people and they are all hiding. Or your whole team is flying in a chopper and you have to spawn in it every time. I like both games but battlefield could only keep me interested for 3 weeks because it only came with 4 maps and 2 game types. It was also very choppy with the graphics, it looks like total poo, and it would give me a headache cause it looks so bad. I'm not upset at all. You can play whatever you want it doesn't affect me at all. I'm just saying your argument is flawed and i can't figure out why you battlefield guys nut hug so hard on this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Implied Volatility Newbie

Implied Volatility

Posted
Posted

Im not upset at all. I think you need to relax a bit guy. Im just talking about the games. Do you work for the battlefield people? That dumb comment can go both ways. I'm just trying to figure out why you guys hate so much. The main things I've heard are perks, kill streaks, camping, and paying for maps. Battlefield has perks. Battlefield doesn't have kill streaks but they have choppers, tanks, and uavs. Snipers get mortars just for camping for 30 seconds. The big thing everyone said about getting this game is because people don't camp in it and everyone works together on it. That is a load poo. I was getting into matches all the time where everyone is sniping. You can't even get near the objective because you can only be on a team of 4 people and they are all hiding. Or your whole team is flying in a chopper and you have to spawn in it every time. I like both games but battlefield could only keep me interested for 3 weeks because it only came with 4 maps and 2 game types. It was also very choppy with the graphics, it looks like total poo, and it would give me a headache cause it looks so bad. I'm not upset at all. You can play whatever you want it doesn't affect me at all. I'm just saying your argument is flawed and i can't figure out why you battlefield guys nut hug so hard on this game.

Battlefield series > COD series....Yeah, I said it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mage
      Why do people think Bryce Young won this game yesterday?

      By Mage · Posted

      Who is "they"?  Who in the media still argues that Bryce Young could reach the levels that people thought he would before the draft? I mean, nobody is going to come outright and bash the kid.  By all accounts he's a good dude and I think that is why you don't see the media come after him like they did Zach Wilson.
    • electro's horse
      Why do people think Bryce Young won this game yesterday?

      By electro's horse · Posted

      It started during the Denver game after that first drive. i don’t think the panthers got a first down again until the fourth quarter. 
    • Mage
      QB 2026 (For the Young Haters)

      By Mage · Posted

      The Panthers will finish with at least 7-8 wins.  So that leaves them with only two "smart" choices in my opinion: 1. Sign a reasonably priced free agent QB and see if they are better than Bryce Young in training camp - The issue is there will be very little options.  There is almost no way the Colts let Daniel Jones walk.  Rodgers, Flacco, and Wilson will likely retire (and is Wilson better than Bryce anyway?).  Winston is under contract with the Giants for another year.  That leaves Mariota, which I'm all for, but the Commanders will make a big push to keep him given Daniels' injury history.  Outside of him, there is literally nobody else. 2. Stick with Bryce Young for one more year - Nobody wants this to happen, but the Panthers won't be in a position to draft one in the first round and it isn't a strong class to begin with.  Mendoza, Simpson (and do we really want an Alabama QB?), and Moore will likely all be off the board by the time we pick.  Bryce isn't good, but we are still 5-4.  I'd rather continue to build the rest of the team than reach for a QB.  Then we could set ourselves up nicely in 2027 to make a splash play if we choose.  This is how we should have approached years past; stuck with Kyle Allen or Sam Darnold or Teddy Bridgewater and kept building the team until we were ready to make a splash.  But every year we panicked and did something stupid. There is the idea you could throw a dart at a guy in the later arounds, but IMO this just isn't a good QB class and odds are it will be a wasted pick.  I still think we need a lot of depth on the defense.  I'd rather focus there.
×
×
  • Create New...