Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Game plan criticism from an odd source


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

You don't usually hear this sort of thing from Brad Hoover.

Veteran fullback Brad Hoover said he thinks the Carolina Panthers could have run the ball on Arizona Saturday night.

"Our plan was to try to run the ball on them. That’s what we’ve hung our hat on all year, being successful in the running game, and I still think we could have done it," Hoover said. "Not to question things but, when you start putting yourself in a hole, and we did pretty fast, it’s hard to just run the ball when you’ve put yourself in pass situations."

Hoover thinks Panthers could have run on Cards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. The decision to abandon the run game so early was a bad one. It's not like our run game is a 4-6 yard run team, we have a lot of big runs and even had one against Arizona early on, we could have put up points quickly. I also noticed DWill sitting for a ton of plays in the 2nd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Key stat

Delhomme accounted for six turnovers (five interceptions, one fumble) and the Cardinals scored 23 of their 33 points off of those takeaways.

Our gameplan shoulda been to keep the ball out of Warner's hands, not continually give him the ball. We were lucky he got tired or they might have put up 66 points on us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As sad as it sounds, it looked like a game of Madden gone wrong. Played someone online? Threw an INT or turned it over early? They score. Feels like they went extra hard at you, challeneged your manhood. You say, "Alright, Imma show this mf'er..." You throw non-stop. INTs galore. They run up the score and you are blown out. Only to realize, "Man, I should've just run when I first got down..."

...Never happened to me, but this guy I know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you secretly polled the team, they'd all say wtf? It's impossible for everyone in the world to see that all we had to do was run the ball and cover Fitzgerald and yet we did exactly the opposite.

...by the way, it was just reported on the radio that Delhomme threw yet another interception this morning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...