Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

vick is not available for carolina


KingsoftheSouth

Recommended Posts

I dont think u guys are in the market for a qb, you won 12 games with the one you have, you guys are being a little harsh on your qb. im a falcons fan, as ive already made a few post stating such.

I dont know why anyone here would want michael vick. but ive seen a few post mentioning him i want to clear this up.

Michael vick, is still a falcon, he is on our roster and if reinstated to the NFL he is under contract with the falcons.

what does this mean? The falcons decide where vick goes. We will trade him(and not get much i know) but we will trade him none the less. and the falcons WILL NOT trade him to a division rival and have to face him twice a year. as matter of fact the team that the falcons do trade him to, there will be an agreement that if the team the falcons trade vick to trades vick to one of our division rivals there will be a steep penalty, like 3-4 draft picks.

thats what the packers did with favre when they traded him to the jets, just to make sure the jets didnt turn around and trade him to the vikes.

Vick is a scumbag you guys dont want him anyway, i'd take jake over vick. but if you guys did want him its not possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are a moron if you think anyone was serious about bringing him on this team.
real classy response, i can be just as nasty, im sure theres ppl in your fanbase that remembers vick marching an offense up and down the field on you guys, and would consider wanting him over jake, this post is for those ppl.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

real classy response, i can be just as nasty, im sure theres ppl in your fanbase that remembers vick marching an offense up and down the field on you guys, and would consider wanting him over jake, this post is for those ppl.
seriously.......

NO PANTHER FAN WANTS VICK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I would rather keep Jake, which is what I believe is going to happen anyway, than have Vick replace him. Jake isnt the best QB, but he did win us 12 games this year and got us a winning season, which is more than last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I would rather keep Jake, which is what I believe is going to happen anyway, than have Vick replace him. Jake isnt the best QB, but he did win us 12 games this year and got us a winning season, which is more than last season.

"Jake won us 12 games this year"

Was the Oakland game one of the 12 that he won us this year? Stop using the term "He won us 12 games." The team won 12 games, he just happened to be playing at the QB spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael vick, is still a falcon, he is on our roster and if reinstated to the NFL he is under contract with the falcons.

No one's going to trade for Vick when they know that the Falcons aren't going to keep him. (Blank has said as much, reiterating this stance about 30 minutes ago on 790.) The only options the Falcons have are (a)keep him (not going to happen or (b)cut him.

Falcons have no leverage whatsoever in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

? when Vick is reinstated to the Falcons since he is under contract, wouldn';t that mean he would be due the remaining value of that contract. If that is the case what NFL team would trade for him regardless of what they give up to take on that contract. My understanding may be wrong but Vick would have to agree to restructure his contract which is no guarantee he would be willing to do.

That leaves the Falcons 2 options keep him and pay him or Cut him where he would be free to sign with any team. There is no way the Pantehrs bring him in regardless and I'm pretty sure when he does come back he won't be near the player he once was, IMO he should probley come back as a WR who coyuld play a number of positions in differnt formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, Adam Schefter from the NFL Network reported that Carolina might be looking for a QB this offseason and the two possible names that came up were Derek Anderson and Michael Vick.

I posted that in a thread that I made but never did I clearly state that I wanted Vick on this roster and nor do I. I would rather have Leaf the Vick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really?  Back to this again? How many times have I said that I’d prefer to trade back from #1? Too many to count, but as I’ve pointed out, that’s going to be much easier said than done, as once we signal we want to trade back, teams will know we don’t want any of the QBs and they’d target the 2nd pick in a trade instead. All of my “T-Mac at #1” talk has been discussed under two circumstances… the first being that no QB or DE pop before the draft, and that we can’t trade back. But again, I know you don’t like to actually read that stuff when I say it, as I’ve said it numerous times.
    • Thanks for posting this. While this was far from a great performance, this critique shows what some of us noticed last week. Bryce played "a little better". There is some talent there. But, as you pointed out we really don't have a great pass blocking line for dropping back each down when we are behind. BY has got some bad habits and physical limitations. At times his teammates let him down. The play calling isn't always the best. I hope he can learn from last week and show us some improvement in the Saints game.
    • Oh, and yes, I’d take a WR first in this upcoming draft, but again, that’s not in a vacuum I wouldn’t have taken him over the QBs this past year or likely the ones next year either. It’s all relative to who is available in a specific draft, and I don’t think any of the QB’s are worth the risk at #1 this year. Also the fact that you’ve said you would take T-Mac #2 but scoff at him going #1 is just in itself, super weird.  How you can justify a player at #2 but not #1 solely because of their position and with complete disregard to the other players available, is absolutely crazy town talk
×
×
  • Create New...