Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

vick is not available for carolina


KingsoftheSouth

Recommended Posts

I dont think u guys are in the market for a qb, you won 12 games with the one you have, you guys are being a little harsh on your qb. im a falcons fan, as ive already made a few post stating such.

I dont know why anyone here would want michael vick. but ive seen a few post mentioning him i want to clear this up.

Michael vick, is still a falcon, he is on our roster and if reinstated to the NFL he is under contract with the falcons.

what does this mean? The falcons decide where vick goes. We will trade him(and not get much i know) but we will trade him none the less. and the falcons WILL NOT trade him to a division rival and have to face him twice a year. as matter of fact the team that the falcons do trade him to, there will be an agreement that if the team the falcons trade vick to trades vick to one of our division rivals there will be a steep penalty, like 3-4 draft picks.

thats what the packers did with favre when they traded him to the jets, just to make sure the jets didnt turn around and trade him to the vikes.

Vick is a scumbag you guys dont want him anyway, i'd take jake over vick. but if you guys did want him its not possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are a moron if you think anyone was serious about bringing him on this team.
real classy response, i can be just as nasty, im sure theres ppl in your fanbase that remembers vick marching an offense up and down the field on you guys, and would consider wanting him over jake, this post is for those ppl.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

real classy response, i can be just as nasty, im sure theres ppl in your fanbase that remembers vick marching an offense up and down the field on you guys, and would consider wanting him over jake, this post is for those ppl.
seriously.......

NO PANTHER FAN WANTS VICK!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I would rather keep Jake, which is what I believe is going to happen anyway, than have Vick replace him. Jake isnt the best QB, but he did win us 12 games this year and got us a winning season, which is more than last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I would rather keep Jake, which is what I believe is going to happen anyway, than have Vick replace him. Jake isnt the best QB, but he did win us 12 games this year and got us a winning season, which is more than last season.

"Jake won us 12 games this year"

Was the Oakland game one of the 12 that he won us this year? Stop using the term "He won us 12 games." The team won 12 games, he just happened to be playing at the QB spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael vick, is still a falcon, he is on our roster and if reinstated to the NFL he is under contract with the falcons.

No one's going to trade for Vick when they know that the Falcons aren't going to keep him. (Blank has said as much, reiterating this stance about 30 minutes ago on 790.) The only options the Falcons have are (a)keep him (not going to happen or (b)cut him.

Falcons have no leverage whatsoever in this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

? when Vick is reinstated to the Falcons since he is under contract, wouldn';t that mean he would be due the remaining value of that contract. If that is the case what NFL team would trade for him regardless of what they give up to take on that contract. My understanding may be wrong but Vick would have to agree to restructure his contract which is no guarantee he would be willing to do.

That leaves the Falcons 2 options keep him and pay him or Cut him where he would be free to sign with any team. There is no way the Pantehrs bring him in regardless and I'm pretty sure when he does come back he won't be near the player he once was, IMO he should probley come back as a WR who coyuld play a number of positions in differnt formations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record, Adam Schefter from the NFL Network reported that Carolina might be looking for a QB this offseason and the two possible names that came up were Derek Anderson and Michael Vick.

I posted that in a thread that I made but never did I clearly state that I wanted Vick on this roster and nor do I. I would rather have Leaf the Vick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reality though is that there just isn't a traditional #1 pick type of player in this draft to begin with. He might have been below Marvin last year, but I don't think he'd have been below Nabers. And if you think he disappears in some college games, then you're only looking at the box scores, I guarantee you not a single NFL GM will say he disappears in games when watching the tape. Arizona's offense is a MESS this year, the new coaching staff is beyond bad and the fanbase is screaming for them all to be fired, our OL is awful, our QB is playing like utter garbage, and we don't have another weapon to attract any defensive attention.  Teams are double and triple teaming him on almost every snap, and when combined with the OL and QB issues, it's just impossible to get him the ball sometimes.  And even when our QB forces the pass to him, half the time it's not even catchable given how poor he's been playing. And even despite all that, he's still 3rd in the nation in yards. I've also seen more WR rankings having Burden over Hunter than I have seen Hunter over T-Mac.  If we had a true outside #1 WR, then taking someone like Hunter (or Burden) instead of T-Mac would make more sense as if Hunter were to play WR in the NFL, he'd more likely be used a slot guy like Godwin or Kupp.   There's a reason most mocks/analysts who don't list Hunter as a CB/WR (or just Athlete) list him as a CB.  Because it's his better position and the side of the ball he's more likely to play in the NFL, partially due to his wire thin frame, I don't see him holding up long term as a WR.
    • This was a good breakdown from Daniels.  Last year has had a lasting impact on Young. He still isn't getting the time needed from the OL - the OL we have is made to establish the run and for the run to be in play.  We get behind and have to throw all game we are doomed with this O-line. His receivers have to catch the ball when he makes a good throw to them, he can't have them dropping his good passes. Why are we running 4 slants all toward the same direction?  Why a triple option on 4th and 1? That's on the coaches. Bryce gets hurried and starts slinging the ball where it shouldn't be thrown, more study and recognition from him are needed.  Bryce doesn't step up in the pocket and throws too soon and unbalanced.  He over and under throws the ball because of it.  That's on him.  If the pocket isn't there and he can't get his base set he needs to check down or "live to fight another day." He has been thrown to the wolves and has lost his confidence.  This team doesn't have much, if any, talent and it's a cluster.  I think he can still be an NFL QB.  Maybe not a QB1 in the short term, but if he has a chance with better coaching and personnel he may be better than we are giving him credit for. I think we ruined him last year and have not fixed anything to help him this year.  If we can't run or get way behind all NFL defenses are coming after him.  Dalton has more respect and defenses didn't always sell out to get to him because he'd hit a quick slant, screen, or check down because he has the experience to know what's coming and what to do. Just my 2 cents.
    • All depends on who the backup is. Josh Allen probably would have been benched too if there were better backups than Matt Barkley and Nate peterman.
×
×
  • Create New...