Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smitty's broken arm has been a blessing in disguise...


Zod

Recommended Posts

I actually think it hurts us badly but not how most think....

the biggest questions mark coming into this season is how the DL plays in regards to pressure.....if they can get enough pressure so teams don't pick us apart. Well, if all we have to test the defense is Dwyane Jarrett, LaFell, and Moore.....the defense might not get a true test how effective they are. I mean, you can probably give Jarrett and company more time to run there routes and the secondary still survives and looks effective. No team we play is going to be attacking us with the caliber of WRs our defense is currently seeing. I think not having Smitty hurts the defenses ability to gauge where they are.

The hell?

Our D-line is going up against one of the best O-lines in the leauge, a long with one of the best running backs. If they are getting off O-line blocks then they know they are doing ok, if they are getting beat to the ground then they know they still need work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hell?

Our D-line is going up against one of the best O-lines in the leauge, a long with one of the best running backs. If they are getting off O-line blocks then they know they are doing ok, if they are getting beat to the ground then they know they still need work...

there is a huge difference defending and getting to a QB when you have Steve Smith caliber WRs you have to worry about......and then with Jarrett/LaFell caliber only WRs. Gotta get to the QB faster to help the secondary with the likes of Smith. Smitty is now out of the equation and defense simply has an easier task. They can take longer to apply pressure and it won't be as costly. imo.

Defense and secondary also plays differently. Beason has commented on it before. The offense are not the only ones who miss out when Smitty can't go.

I don't see how you can judge the pass rush as it relates to not putting the secondary in a bad spot when the only WRs you have are sub par.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is kenny fast enough to take on the X receiver role?

if so then that would allow smith to fall into the flanker or slot receiver role where it seems he would more like to be.

i do think that unless lafell is a whole lot of fail, moore's best hope is to be the 3rd receiver. lafell just fits the moose role better than anyone (except for maybe jarrett if he gets a clue).

But the Panther's don't have Moose anymore. We don't need someone to play his role, we need someone to play their own role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ProFootballTalk now reports that insiders at Panthers camp say that Matt Moore is already relegated to the backup spot and many in camp are glad Steve Smith (not the good one) is hurt.

At least he's not gonna punch anyone this time!

PFT is still making stuff up all the time:

RT @ProFootballTalk: Report: Lewis not "entirely on board" with Owens addition ... Just spent 70 minutes with Lewis. I'd heartily disagree.

http://twitter.com/SI_PeterKing

:out:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the Panther's don't have Moose anymore. We don't need someone to play his role, we need someone to play their own role.
I guess he meant the role of receiver/blocker. We are still a running team, so whomever gets the number two spot will have to block as well as catch the ball.
this^^^^

we need someone who is a big downfield blocker who can also make the big catch.

now....if we do move kenny into the X position then we could move smith into the slot where he'd rather be. if we are going to have a lot of 3 receiver sets anyway (which it sounds like is going to be the case) then this would make sense.

my question is still....does kenny have the jets to be that downfield threat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
    • Not a chance the SEC could compete with the NFL.  In the large cities that are not in the Southeast, (LA, NYC, Chicago, SF) College football is an afterthought.  
×
×
  • Create New...