Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FREEAGENCY FRENZY

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

They cannot afford to whiff on this Tershawn signing. He better produce for what they’re paying. I don’t believe for a second there was another team offering anything close to this 

I don't either. I think it was a massive overpay and panic move. Overall free agency has been a pretty mixed bag for us, IMO. But it was last offseason too.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

OTC shows it as: $26,699,732

Spotrac shows it as: $27,791,607

is that updated because if it is that tells me the next years we are going be up against it again and secondly Morgan isnt done.  Why keep that much if you dont need to.  He should have front loaded more if he doesnt spend that. So I am thinking something else is up

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

is that updated because if it is that tells me the next years we are going be up against it again and secondly Morgan isnt done.  Why keep that much if you dont need to.  He should have front loaded more if he doesnt spend that. So I am thinking something else is up

I think a couple of deals still haven't posted. Plus, you figure we have the cap for the rookie deals and we probably sign some other warm bodies along the way.

Ideally, we try to roll at least half that number. You have to consider we have two "premium" positions that decisions will need to be made on in the coming future, QB and LT. Those will be large chunks of money if those players are retained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think a couple of deals still haven't posted. Plus, you figure we have the cap for the rookie deals and we probably sign some other warm bodies along the way.

Ideally, we try to roll at least half that number. You have to consider we have two "premium" positions that decisions will need to be made on in the coming future, QB and LT. Those will be large chunks of money if those players are retained.

Until its accurately updated its hard to really understand it, but I am pretty sure 26 and 27 we are going to be tight as well I could be wrong but we have some big contracts already on the books

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Until its accurately updated its hard to really understand it, but I am pretty sure 26 and 27 we are going to be tight as well I could be wrong but we have some big contracts already on the books

I looked at 26 and we have about $89 mil but that is for 26 players with two contracts still yet to be posted. Overall, that's not great. Not terrible but we still have to fill out half a roster with moderately limited resources. 

Lots of time to tinker, though. There are 5 total void hits for 2026.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CarolinaLivin Grand Master

CarolinaLivin

Posted
Posted

49ers have blown up their roster

The 49ers have lost nine starters from their 2024 roster with eight of those nine leaving in free agency. The NFL's other 31 teams have been scooping up the 49ers' free agents: They've spent $321 million on 49ers players, which is the most money EVER spent on a team's departing free agents. 

NFL teams were more than happy to sign all the players that the 49ers have given up on. So what's actually going on in San Francisco? It blowing up the roster going to work? We took a closer look at the situation here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

49ers have blown up their roster

The 49ers have lost nine starters from their 2024 roster with eight of those nine leaving in free agency. The NFL's other 31 teams have been scooping up the 49ers' free agents: They've spent $321 million on 49ers players, which is the most money EVER spent on a team's departing free agents. 

NFL teams were more than happy to sign all the players that the 49ers have given up on. So what's actually going on in San Francisco? It blowing up the roster going to work? We took a closer look at the situation here. 

"Blowing up" is hyperbolic. They have been handing out massive contracts for 2-3 years now so eventually they were going to be forced to make tough choices. Plus they are now gonna have to actually pay their QB something above a dollar store rate. This was a predictable situation(there had been several articles on it over the past two seasons).

The question is how much of an impact it will have on their overall outcome. Is it a retool or a mild rebuild?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CanadianCat
      Panthers Top 15 Paid Players at Position

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      Ok but is the alternative? He is not going to sign for a lesser contract, so then do you release him? We did that with Burns... see how that is working out. You can save the cap but you still need to replace the player. You can argue that we should have be preparing to replace Horn when his deal came up but we dealt those picks to get a QB.  Im curious to know how you would have handled it differently..
    • jtm
      Aiyuk

      By jtm · Posted

      Perhaps you are correct but it has been a long time since the Panthers had a WR core that scared anyone and this could be part of the problem.  They finally found someone with Moore and the fans complained nonstop that he wasn't a true number 1 and perhaps the front office agreed and why he was traded.  If Warren is there at number 8, that's going to be the pick.  
    • hgfthmug
      Rtdtfyfy

      By hgfthmug · Posted

      https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC https://support.google.com/edu/classroom/thread/331074933?hl=en&sjid=8642042419102264480-NC
×
×
  • Create New...