Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox Looks Over Mike Defense


beastson

Recommended Posts

People tend to forget that. Not only is he a defensive coordinator, but the head coach. He makes adjustments too. He took over last year. Its obvious since we was winning, nobody thought we should make a change. Kept on doing it

So if you going to blame Mike, blame Fox too

Inexcusable our D faded away since the first bye and the only thing that changed was the blitzes in the N.O game. I mean come on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People tend to forget that. Not only is he a defensive coordinator, but the head coach. He makes adjustments too. He took over last year. Its obvious since we was winning, nobody thought we should make a change. Kept on doing it

So if you going to blame Mike, blame Fox too

Inexcusable our D faded away since the first bye and the only thing that changed was the blitzes in the N.O game. I mean come on

Right, thats why I don't think firing Trgo will do anything. Coaches don't typically bring in an outside person whose specialty is their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, thats why I don't think firing Trgo will do anything. Coaches don't typically bring in an outside person whose specialty is their own.

Bingo. That mean they both agree on the defense

I knew it was a agreement the day he made an excuse about us playing a lot of top offenses

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People tend to forget that. Not only is he a defensive coordinator, but the head coach. He makes adjustments too. He took over last year. Its obvious since we was winning, nobody thought we should make a change. Kept on doing it

So if you going to blame Mike, blame Fox too

Inexcusable our D faded away since the first bye and the only thing that changed was the blitzes in the N.O game. I mean come on

Of course were blaming Fox too...........I want Cowher the rest of you tards can keep Fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't think Fox is going anywhere. But if by some chance he does get the axe, I like Cowher but, I am tired of retreads in the NFL. I'd like to see the FO go after Rex Ryan.

I just wondering if this is possible that we are going to the 3-4. With what pep has said it seems like Fox is not in a safe place and I doubt pep will want to be around for a coach change. IDK the media could just be playing it up and Peppers is not much of a talker so it could be nothing but the way people are talking something big might happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think it's unfounded to think that if we replace Turdo, it'll be with someone just like him; bland, bend-but-dont-break, poor adjustments, poor schemes. remember, before Turdo we had Del Rio and the best defense we've ever had.

there's no guarantee that we'll get rid of Turdo, in fact, it's not likely. however, if it does happen, it's quite possible that we get someone w/ some real talent to replace him.

all we can do is hold out hope!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Where did I once say we should draft him because he's a projected Top 5 pick?   That's one of my many problems with you, your reading comprehension skills are very poor (and/or you just don't care to use your brain, one of the two).  I solely used that to point out that me pushing T-Mac isn't some absurd homerism, that at least I'm pushing someone who is deserving of a Top 5 draft pick. And despite me explaining it to you numerous times, you still seem to not grasp how QB's get placed in mock drafts vs draft grades.  They are treated entirely different in mock drafts to any other position, because of how teams generally treat them in the draft because of how important the position is. Literally any other position except QB, mock drafts generally follow draft grades with some team needs factored in.  But with QB's, draft grades are generally disregarded and they ALWAYS put a few QB's at the very top of the draft, because that's just usually what happens.  The exact same thing happened in 2022 with guys like Pickett and Willis widely being Top 10 picks in mock drafts, only for Pickett to fall to what, around 20?, and Willis going in the 2nd round (and even being the 3rd QB if I remember correctly too). The overwhelming majority of draft experts are saying there isn't a high first round grade on these QB's, but they still get mocked there because they're trying to predict how the draft will actually go. That's been my point the entire time, reaching for a QB in a bad QB draft when you have a roster as depleted of talent as ours, does not tend to work out well. And I've never said I'm not open to other players, I've very explicitly said that if a QB or DE stands out come draft time, I'm open to that discussion.  That I'd be open to Hunter as a CB but I prefer a WR over a CB at the top of the draft.  But we're also not talking about the 15th pick here where there could realistically be all sorts of possible picks to discuss.  With the first pick, there really would only be a small handful of options, T-Mac is head and shoulders above any other given our current roster and state of the franchise in general.
    • TMac is good, but he isn't pick 1 on a WR good.  Last year he would be below Nabers and Williams.  This year you could argue Hunter is the better WR.  WR at 1 better be a Calvin Johnson not a WR that disappears some games in college...
    • So because he's a projected top 5 pick he's should be the guy we draft.   Yet you say the other 2 QBs who are projected top 5 picks are not worth it because you think they aren't that good.   That's my problem with you. You just seem to only care about Tmac. I have yet to see you suggest anyone outside of Tmac. At least I'm open to other prospects.
×
×
  • Create New...