Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Worries about Beasons position change..


The Question

Recommended Posts

Why Beason's move WILL work...

Leadership - Beason is still going to be running this defense and even in a bigger way in some assets as the WLB is the most important position in the Tampa 2.

Conner - We needed to get this guy on the field one way or another. He is an athletic, intelligent player who has a nose for the ball.

The one reason I think this move WON'T work...

Comfort - I cannot agree with making this move when the team is just getting into their comfort zone with this scheme. I think making this move will definitely cause some kinks that need to be worked out. Something we can't afford to have this season. Connor is at the core going to be a rookie this season with quite a bit of responsibility, and Beason may not be as good in covering slot receivers as we may think with his lack of height.

What are you guys thinking?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I worry about the confusion of the leadership role. Beason deserves his alpha dog position. However the Mike a leadership position. Connor also appears to have those leadership qualities and this could really cause some confusion from our young defensive guys. And LB is a place where you can't afford all the second guessing and hesitation. I hate to see Connor going to waste but I think someone else can step up to the will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...