Terrell Owens signs with the Bengals

[Floppin]

Id say he had a pretty big hand.

2001 game 1 vs SF: 118 yards 2 TD

2001 game 2 vs SF: 99 yards 1 TD

2004 vs Philly: 123 yards

2006 vs Dallas: 107 yards

2007 vs Dallas 48 yards 1 TD (missed 3.5 quarters of the game)

2009 vs Buffalo 27 yards ( Ryan Fitzpatrick at QB???)

Face it, TO is our daddy!

Your argument has an inherent contradiction. You discount the game with fitzpatrick as qb but it seems that the argument should be that the quarterbacks beat us and not TO. Since apparently TO does not have the ability to make his qb better, quite the inverse actually. Perhaps if TO passed to himself. Anyhow, to summarize, you fail.

[Wither]

Your argument has an inherent contradiction. You discount the game with fitzpatrick as qb but it seems that the argument should be that the quarterbacks beat us and not TO. Since apparently TO does not have the ability to make his qb better, quite the inverse actually. Perhaps if TO passed to himself. Anyhow, to summarize, you fail.

Don't worry; CheddarBob will just brush off your logic and continue with her trolling.

[The NFL Shield At Midfield]

Your argument has an inherent contradiction. You discount the game with fitzpatrick as qb but it seems that the argument should be that the quarterbacks beat us and not TO. Since apparently TO does not have the ability to make his qb better, quite the inverse actually. Perhaps if TO passed to himself. Anyhow, to summarize, you fail.

PantherRobert, get on this and show him the error of his ways post haste

[CharlotteBeer.com]

PantherBob is playing you all for fools. I know he probably does think TO is a great receiver that the Panthers would have been lucky to have, but it's obvious he's just messing with you guys right now.

[PantherBob]

Your argument has an inherent contradiction. You discount the game with fitzpatrick as qb but it seems that the argument should be that the quarterbacks beat us and not TO. Since apparently TO does not have the ability to make his qb better, quite the inverse actually. Perhaps if TO passed to himself. Anyhow, to summarize, you fail.

Ok then I guess steve smith is an average receiver too since jake couldn't get him the ball much last year

[Dpantherman]

on and TO's agent named the interested teams...the Panthers were NOT mentioned

[Wither]

PantherBob is playing you all for fools. I know he probably does think TO is a great receiver that the Panthers would have been lucky to have, but it's obvious he's just messing with you guys right now.

That's all he does is troll.

[Floppin]

Ok then I guess steve smith is an average receiver too since jake couldn't get him the ball much last year

I never said that TO was an average receiver. The only point I was making was that it was NOT TO that won or lost the games against us, but it was the play of the quarterback and his ability to get the ball to TO (with the exception of the Bills game in which we just played like poo). TO does not make his quarterbacks better, if he did than Fitzpatrick would have had better numbers for that game correct? It can be argued that if TO does not trust his quarterback he does not play hard, making it even harder for the quarterback to succeed.

The point is it's the person directing the play that is responsible for TO's numbers, not TO. The only thing TO is responsible for is actually catching the passes and YAC.

Let me give you an analogy. It is not your keyboards fault that you seem so incredibly stupid, but it is, in fact, your brain's fault for throwing passes via keystrokes.

[Zcustom]

hey pantherbob, come to daddy....

xoxoxo T.O.

[PantherBob]

I never said that TO was an average receiver. The only point I was making was that it was NOT TO that won or lost the games against us, but it was the play of the quarterback and his ability to get the ball to TO (with the exception of the Bills game in which we just played like poo). TO does not make his quarterbacks better, if he did than Fitzpatrick would have had better numbers for that game correct? It can be argued that if TO does not trust his quarterback he does not play hard, making it even harder for the quarterback to succeed.

The point is it's the person directing the play that is responsible for TO's numbers, not TO. The only thing TO is responsible for is actually catching the passes and YAC.

Let me give you an analogy. It is not your keyboards fault that you seem so incredibly stupid, but it is, in fact, your brain's fault for throwing passes via keystrokes.

Gotcha so steve smith had nothing to do with any of our wins either since he didn't throw the ball to himself

[Floppin]

Gotcha so steve smith had nothing to do with any of our wins either since he didn't throw the ball to himself

God your dense. It's a receivers job to get open and catch balls, some are better than others. Steve Smith and TO are both fantastic receivers from this point of view. But if balls aren't being thrown their way or aren't being thrown where they can be caught then it means fugall what they do. They could be running around in circles with one hand on their cocks wide open, but unless the quarterback can get them the ball it doesn't matter. This is why a quarterback makes a receiver not the other way around. Sure some receivers make it easier on a quarterback by catching off the mark balls (steve smith with Jake) but essentially the offense runs through the QB, hence why the QB will win or lose the game for you, not the receiver, unless he fumbles repeatedly or has multiple drops.

[X-Clown]

Dwayne Jarrett owns Tampa Bay since we are 4-2 against them since he's joined the team.

[Dpantherman]

whats pantherbob gettin' into now?

[PantherBob]

God your dense. It's a receivers job to get open and catch balls, some are better than others. Steve Smith and TO are both fantastic receivers from this point of view. But if balls aren't being thrown their way or aren't being thrown where they can be caught then it means f**kall what they do. They could be running around in circles with one hand on their cocks wide open, but unless the quarterback can get them the ball it doesn't matter. This is why a quarterback makes a receiver not the other way around. Sure some receivers make it easier on a quarterback by catching off the mark balls (steve smith with Jake) but essentially the offense runs through the QB, hence why the QB will win or lose the game for you, not the receiver, unless he fumbles repeatedly or has multiple drops.

Gotcha, so steve smiths 200 yard game vs the bears had nothing to do with that win. It was all jake delomme... He made steve smith!!