Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Difference Between a Bro and a Guido

NJPanthers12

By NJPanthers12,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
Posted

I want to once and for all make it clear that I am not a guido and state the differences between a bro and a guido.

Bros love being able to brag about their drinking plans to friends at work. Bros especially love to rehash stories on Monday morning about their wild weekend, which inevitably end with the phrase, “Dude we were so fuged up!” Theya also enjoy calling girls sl uts to their faces and running mad bro trains. Bros are also scientifically proven to be the best looking and smartest human beings on the planet. It is not an opinion but more a fact and whoever does not agree is just a bro hater. Most importantly bros only wear ankle socks and if you do not wear ankle socks your are the ultimate bro hater.

****** are dumb italians (i am italian) who spend hours upon hours getting ready and gelling their hair for the night. Bros dont need all that time to get ready because bros are the best looking people on the planet. They like to pump their fists and start fights, but would never dare to fight a bro because they know they would lose.

Therefor in conclusions bros are better then ****** and now everyone knows. I hope this clarifies everything for everyone ecspecially saltman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zcustom Newbie

Zcustom

Posted
Posted

I want to once and for all make it clear that I am not a guido and state the differences between a bro and a guido.

Bros love being able to brag about their drinking plans to friends at work. Bros especially love to rehash stories on Monday morning about their wild weekend, which inevitably end with the phrase, “Dude we were so fuged up!” Theya also enjoy calling girls sl uts to their faces and running mad bro trains. Bros are also scientifically proven to be the best looking and smartest human beings on the planet. It is not an opinion but more a fact and whoever does not agree is just a bro hater. Most importantly bros only wear ankle socks and if you do not wear ankle socks your are the ultimate bro hater.

****** are dumb italians (i am italian) who spend hours upon hours getting ready and gelling their hair for the night. Bros dont need all that time to get ready because bros are the best looking people on the planet. They like to pump their fists and start fights, but would never dare to fight a bro because they know they would lose.

Therefor in conclusions bros are better then ****** and now everyone knows. I hope this clarifies everything for everyone ecspecially saltman.

Makes perfect sense, bro :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Skew Newbie

Skew

Posted
Posted

I want to once and for all make it clear that I am not a guido and state the differences between a bro and a guido.

Bros love being able to brag about their drinking plans to friends at work. Bros especially love to rehash stories on Monday morning about their wild weekend, which inevitably end with the phrase, “Dude we were so fuged up!” Theya also enjoy calling girls sl uts to their faces and running mad bro trains. Bros are also scientifically proven to be the best looking and smartest human beings on the planet. It is not an opinion but more a fact and whoever does not agree is just a bro hater. Most importantly bros only wear ankle socks and if you do not wear ankle socks your are the ultimate bro hater.

****** are dumb italians (i am italian) who spend hours upon hours getting ready and gelling their hair for the night. Bros dont need all that time to get ready because bros are the best looking people on the planet. They like to pump their fists and start fights, but would never dare to fight a bro because they know they would lose.

Therefor in conclusions bros are better then ****** and now everyone knows. I hope this clarifies everything for everyone ecspecially saltman.

Also see: Difference between a Douche and a Turd Sandwich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NJPanthers12 Proficient

NJPanthers12

Posted
  • Author
Posted

you like bromances right? A bro having a romance with another bro?? is this correct???

yes a bromance is sacred between two bros. its the ultiamte repsect you can have for another bro. someone that has your utmost respect, someone you are ready to go into battle with whenever a dumb smut wants a dobule team, someone you would not mind conducting a train for with the rest of his bros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      Game thread

      By frankw · Posted

      Man whether it's the Panthers or the Hornets it's crazy how many foolish talking heads there are in the local media. I just unsubscribed from locked on Hornets. Doug Branson with his cheesy mustache is an absolute clown especially when his partner isn't on. Talking about trading LaMelo because he can't win basketball games by himself with no semblance whatsoever of a legitimate Center. These YouTube personalities will say anything for a damn click.
    • trucpfan
      Dream big: Imagine this future and tell me how you feel

      By trucpfan · Posted

      I’m hoping for that exact same scenario, two seconds would be big for us. I’d hope for 3 impact players. A WR/DL/DE that can contribute like this current class would be key to our rebuild.
    • outlaw4
      Forget about Bryce, Dave Canales is who we should be talking about.

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      When I look at what I can find, a carryover problem from last season is our receivers are still unable to get enough separation on a consistent basis. Canales is certainly better at scheming them open, like how he sneaked out Thielen for a big play. But then he's also having Thielen running routes he frankly shouldn't be doing anymore. I feel part of the RZ issues is not really having anyone - after trading Diontae - who can make those quick cuts on a short field to give whoever is under center a wider window to throw. We also only have one guy with blazing speed in Thompkins and from what I could see, he's really used more to draw away coverage. I bring this all up because what Canales needs for sustained success - other than QB - is the other receiver pieces we'll be getting in the offseason.  Otherwise, I have to say that Canales isn't as afraid to be aggressive offensively. As others mentioned, still doesn't run the ball enough at times. Finally, I still feel his playcalls still doesn't line up with his mantra of getting rid of the ball within x amount of seconds. Maybe I count too slow. Oh, and I'm glad Canales first game after a bye looked good. I feared he'd be like Ron Rivera where we would fall flat on our faces.
×
×
  • Create New...