Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ncaa 11


PantherfanB

Recommended Posts

I got it, played only one game so far (Waiting for down-loadable rosters). Ive never done a Online Dynasty. how does it work?

I have ver 1.0 of the updated rosters, you can find the gamertags to get them from if you just google it. Online dynasty works like regular dynasty except players control a select number of teams. From my experience doing a dynasty works best if you do a league like the acc or sec instead of letting people just choose whatever team they want so you can get player vs player games more often and fight over recruits instead of mostly just playing against the cpu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So are we going to go with a single conference or spread out? If so the commish needs to schedule the non-conference games well. Also, Pantherfan, what rosters are you using for the dynasty? We definitely need an updated one, at least one with names added.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea, the rosters i used was gamertag CK11

that roster really isn't that good, it has made up players on a bunch of teams because they didn't want to go to the effort of making new players. Theres probably three or four of the transferred SC players that are still on the roster. I would wait a couple revisions till you start so the rosters are "accurate"......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i honestly wont notice made up players. as long as the big names are on the right teams thats all i care about. it seems like pantherfanb just did auto name for the online dynasty anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would set one up but I already started a single player online Dynasty so I could do the recruiting from the PC. If someone wants to set one up with named rosters I would be happy to join, gamertag is theant1h3ro....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...