Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

King, Rosario, Barnidge


Zod

Recommended Posts

Barnidge definietely has the most potential but I would say him bc king is a valuable blocker and has decent hands. Rosario also is a good blocker and has above average hands while also contibuting on special teams. They are all roughly the same age and like I said barnidge could eventually be better than both of them but he hasn't reached that potential yet. And until he does he is a third tight end and those are a dime a dozen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going by this current off season ideology, then it likely would be King. A decent player in his own right, but has reached his ceiling. I would be surprised if they are able to keep him around after this season, as he is a multiple year starter, so it would make a ton of sense.

Barnidge would be the only one who would appear safe as he has years on his contract and is young with huge potential. However he also has produced the least...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

barnidge has the most upside as a receiver.

rosario has a lot of potential as well but probably not as high as barnidge.

king is a solid blocker and reliable receiver...just not much after the catch.

i'd say if forced to cut one it would be rosario but even with that it would be hard because he contributes in a quite a few other facets.

tough call but i would probably cut rosario. a trade would be nice but i don't know what we could get for him. it would be a shame to let him go. maybe shift him to receiver? i'd rather have him than kenny moore on the roster. i might even put him ahead of jarrett.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously we aren't going to cut anyone particularly since we use so many 2 TE sets.

But in terms of rating them, Barnidge is by far the best of the three. He showed his potential last year averaging 20 yards a catch. With 4.6 speed he instantly creates a matchup problem for any linebacker. I expect him to get 30 catches and 500 yards this season. His blocking is better than folks think at this point.

King and Rosario are similar in that they are not very fast nor are they great getting separation stretching the field or running after the catch. I would rate King second and Rosario third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...