Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther Needs and Draft Depth at Those Positions


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CarolinaLivin said:

Lot of rumors on who we'll be targeting in FA. Will be interesting to see who we actually sign. Can't wait for next week. 

Remember in 2021 when we signed Irving and Eflien to multi year deals like 30 seconds into FA.  Good times good times.   That certainly didnt bite us in the ass.

 

Not sure why I just remembered that but its the first thing that came to mind in regards to Free agency

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Remember in 2021 when we signed Irving and Eflien to multi year deals like 30 seconds into FA.  Good times good times.   That certainly didnt bite us in the ass.

 

Not sure why I just remembered that but its the first thing that came to mind in regards to Free agency

I'm hoping that those days are behind us. Granted not all free agents work out so you cannot expect them to be perfect at it but I would hope more do than don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Adb6368 said:

We need to draft starters with our first 3 picks (and at least 2 of them need to be defense). If we want a RB find one in the later rounds. 

We have to hit on those first 3 picks.  My mind (right now, subject to change often): 

1. (I would love to trade back, but for this exercise)  Edge (unless DT Graham is there) James Pearce, UT.  4.47 40?  Will add 10 lbs. and be a situational pass rusher early on, but he will be a 3-down player soon.

2.  NT Alfred Collins Texas (before free agency, a stud NT beside Brown and, right now, Robinson would make us MUCH BETTER. 6' 6" 330 and runs a sub 5.0 40.   I think he is a perfect NT for Evero.)

3. TE Mason Taylor LSU (Very smooth player with good hands.  Jason Taylor's son.  would start day 1, and with Sanders, we might not miss the lack of a #1 WR as much.)  

4. S/OT

5. OT/S

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Remember in 2021 when we signed Irving and Eflien to multi year deals like 30 seconds into FA.  Good times good times.   That certainly didnt bite us in the ass.

 

Not sure why I just remembered that but its the first thing that came to mind in regards to Free agency

I have really tried to forget times like that. Here's to hoping those days are behind us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Luckily for you someone will make the decision for you. In this case all needs will theoretically be addressed in FA. Now will they be long term fixes? Definitely not in most cases. Those will come from the draft, several drafts in fact. 

I would drive off with a Griswold wagon.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Remember in 2021 when we signed Irving and Eflien to multi year deals like 30 seconds into FA.  Good times good times.   That certainly didnt bite us in the ass.

 

Not sure why I just remembered that but its the first thing that came to mind in regards to Free agency

I was hurt.  It was like being hit in the stomach with a sledge hammer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We have to hit on those first 3 picks.  My mind (right now, subject to change often): 

1. (I would love to trade back, but for this exercise)  Edge (unless DT Graham is there) James Pearce, UT.  4.47 40?  Will add 10 lbs. and be a situational pass rusher early on, but he will be a 3-down player soon.

2.  NT Alfred Collins Texas (before free agency, a stud NT beside Brown and, right now, Robinson would make us MUCH BETTER. 6' 6" 330 and runs a sub 5.0 40.   I think he is a perfect NT for Evero.)

3. TE Mason Taylor LSU (Very smooth player with good hands.  Jason Taylor's son.  would start day 1, and with Sanders, we might not miss the lack of a #1 WR as much.)  

4. S/OT

5. OT/S

 

Pearce gives me serious Brian Burns vibes.  I don't think he'd be a 3 down guy, especially early on in his career.  He's a pass rush specialist and that may be all he'll ever be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

Pearce gives me serious Brian Burns vibes.  I don't think he'd be a 3 down guy, especially early on in his career.  He's a pass rush specialist and that may be all he'll ever be.

That bothers me too.  With Clowney and Wonnum, he would have a year to add 10-15 lbs and hopefully, become a three down edge, but that is all he is right now--you are right. This paragraph gave me hope--(NFL Draft Buzz, fwiw):  "Pearce profiles as an immediate impact pass-rush specialist with the ceiling to develop into a complete three-down edge defender. His elite get-off and bend profile perfectly for today's pass-happy NFL, where his ability to threaten the edge will command attention from day one. Smart defensive coordinators will initially deploy him in obvious passing situations while developing his run defense..." then compares him to Burns.

Let's just hope that Graham falls to us or we get a trade down offer.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

multi year deals for them but a one year deal for Riddick when he was dirt cheap.   ::Sigh::

If the Saints or Bucs paid Fitterer to screw this team up he would not have done a worse job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Adb6368 said:

We need to draft starters with our first 3 picks (and at least 2 of them need to be defense). If we want a RB find one in the later rounds. 

Agreed - I think not tendering Blackshear is a possible sign that we will try and get a RB.  I realize we could still resign him, but with so many picks and such depth at the RB position I think we will take a shot.  Getting a quality starter in round 3 or even 4 is not that hard most years.  There are about 4 guys currently expected to be late 2nd - early 4th that I would not mind getting picked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I found it interesting that one scout said there are 4 blue chip players in this draft, and after that, there is not much difference between the 15th pick and the 50th pick...

I've been noticing this myself, with mocks all over the place after the first few players. Would be a great yea to trade back a bit and still load up with talent. We have so many needs, there's no reason we couldn't get 4-5 players that start or contribute significantly in year 1.

Edited by shaqattaq
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

Agreed - I think not tendering Blackshear is a possible sign that we will try and get a RB.  I realize we could still resign him, but with so many picks and such depth at the RB position I think we will take a shot.  Getting a quality starter in round 3 or even 4 is not that hard most years.  There are about 4 guys currently expected to be late 2nd - early 4th that I would not mind getting picked.

Anyone correct my logic here:  If the draft is loaded at RB and the position is somewhat devalued as a result, why would you tender Blackshear?  Even if you want him, would you not let him test the market and return to play for minimum?  If he leaves, you have a real chance of upgrading for less $$. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

Anyone correct my logic here:  If the draft is loaded at RB and the position is somewhat devalued as a result, why would you tender Blackshear?  Even if you want him, would you not let him test the market and return to play for minimum?  If he leaves, you have a real chance of upgrading for less $$. 

Agree - that is what I think they are doing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Believe it or not, this player was drafted #1 overall in 2022. LG much like players not playing in bowl games and not doing combine drills, its maybe a new normal. Draft is more than college stats..... ITS more magic seeing eye future BS!!!1!11!  
    • https://support.google.com/admanager/thread/328566182/how-much-is-the-cancellation-fee-for-%F0%9D%99%BB%F0%9D%9A%9E%F0%9D%9A%8F%F0%9D%9A%9D%F0%9D%9A%91%F0%9D%9A%8A%F0%9D%9A%97%F0%9D%9A%9C%F0%9D%9A%8A
    • Could this be real or smokescreen  or Warren, come on down Panthers’ Canales putting emphasis on versatility as Carolina looks to evolve TE spot BY MIKE KAYE [email protected] 11hrs ago Dave Canales doesn’t want one-note tight ends in his offense. As the second-year head coach continues to evolve his playbook in Carolina, he’s prioritizing versatility at a key spot on the Panthers’ depth chart. While wide receiver upgrades have become a popular topic in the Queen City, especially on social media, the folks on Mint Street might have a better shot at improving their overall offensive attack with a facelift at tight end. With Tommy Tremble and Ian Thomas headed to free agency later this month, Ja’Tavion Sanders — last year’s fourth-round pick — is the only notable player under contract at the position in 2025. And the lack of solidified players on the depth chart offers up an opportunity to further craft the position in Canales’ image. The offensive play-caller painted a crystal-clear picture of that image last week at the NFL Scouting Combine. “Versatility and toughness, first and foremost,” Canales said. “We’re going to run the ball, so we certainly can’t just take receiving tight ends who give you no value in the run game. At a minimum, this has to be a guy that’s really tough. It doesn’t mean that he’s got to be the 260-pound bruiser that plays in-line. Those guys are cool, too, but if he’s going to be 235 pounds, he has to play with the level of violence because we are going to run the ball a lot. So the versatility is really important for me at the tight end.”   While the veteran free agency class isn’t particularly stocked with notable names that fit that standard, the NFL Draft, according to most media evaluators, has a plethora of those versatile talents, most notably Penn State tight end Tyler Warren. Canales sees a Swiss Army knife of sorts when he watches film the 6-foot-6, 261-pound playmaker. “I think he’s an incredible player,” Canales said. “I think speaking of versatility, here’s a guy that can play close to the interior and play physical because of his sheer size, but then, he does create some mismatches in the pass game, you can hand him the ball. So if you look at some of the teams that are using tight ends for QB sneak — that would be a weapon for somebody in a short-yardage situation to utilize him. So, he’s a very interesting prospect.” Warren — who is currently projected as a top-10 prospect by Pro Football Focus — produced 1,233 receiving yards, 218 rushing yards and 13 total touchdowns (including a passing score) last year for the Nittany Lions. He might be gone by the time the Panthers pick at No. 8 in the first round, or Carolina might prioritize another position with that selection And if the Panthers pass on Warren, they’ll still have plenty of strong options during the rest of draft weekend. Michigan’s Colston Loveland, Texas’s Gunnar Helm, and Miami’s Elijah Arroyo are all projected as top-100 picks. All three would add a playmaking threat to Canales’ offensive play-calling concoction. There’s also Tremble, whom both Canales and general manager Dan Morgan openly expressed desire in bringing back during their time at the combine last week.  Tremble dealt with nagging injuries throughout last season, but still produced a career-high 234 receiving yards. He also has the blocking and receiving versatility that Canales craves. But the Panthers want to make sure they get a fair deal done for both sides. Sometimes, that’s not as easy as it sounds. “Yeah, it’s a challenge, right? Because you want continuity,” Canales said. “Talk about a guy like Tommy Tremble. We’re going through all of our film and he does such a great job. So, now it’s all of a sudden it’s like, in all fairness, like, ‘Let’s let Tommy see what’s out there from a free agency standpoint.’ But for me it’s like, ‘OK, we have these guys that we’ve trained for a year, and you’d love to have them back.’” Sanders set a new franchise rookie record with 342 receiving yards last season. He also improved as a blocker from his college days. While he has shown he can be a key cog in the Carolina offense, the Panthers aren’t going to just settle for continuity, even if that’s seemingly a foundational priority for Canales. Bringing back Sanders and Tremble with minimal enhancement otherwise would be a disservice to the offense’s evolution. Canales knows that and Morgan knows that.
×
×
  • Create New...