Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Raymond Felton for David Lee is a realistic possibility


Recommended Posts

Haha, thats my point.

besides, Dwight Howard is one player, and probably the best center in the NBA. Hes DEFENSIVE ORIENTATED. He has one move on offense, and thats the running hook and its not even that productive. You know how he gets his points? Offensive rebounds, and then dunking it. Whats David Lee known for? Rebounding.

I'll let you geniuses figure it out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think he is the best the Cats can do this year. I really don't like our center or point guard situation as of right now but I think getting rid of Chandler for Terry and using then signing and trading Felton for Lee would be a good start. Hell, and if there is room sign Louis Amundson, now I am just getting stingy.

We don't have the money to do that. Let's assume the highly unlikely scenario of Tyrus Thomas signing for exactly the qualifying offer and we trade Chandler for Jason Terry (which I do love by the way). That would put us at $63,693,786 which would be around $4MM below the luxury tax. David Lee made $7MM and will be looking for a significant raise after the best year of his career. Let's assume Lee wants to play for Charlotte and agrees to a sign-and-trade with a $12MM contract, which he'd be able to get on the open market. That puts our payroll at $75,693,786. Let's also assume that by a stroke of luck that we're able to trade Nazr for a second-round pick by the deadline, meaning we take zero cash back in the deal. That puts our payroll at $68,809,986 and over the luxury tax.

Any number of variables could throw that scenario off. Its more that likely that Tyrus Thomas will require a larger contract than just his qualifying offer. We may not be able to move Nazr for just a draft pick and may have to recieve some salary in return. Nazr would also be our primary back-up at center, which would make trading him more difficult from the Bobcats' point-of-view. There's no way that this Bobcats roster can add Jason Terry and David Lee and stay under the luxury tax. If we're somehow able to move Diaw for a smaller contract though, that's a different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any number of variables could throw that scenario off. Its more that likely that Tyrus Thomas will require a larger contract than just his qualifying offer. We may not be able to move Nazr for just a draft pick and may have to recieve some salary in return. Nazr would also be our primary back-up at center, which would make trading him more difficult from the Bobcats' point-of-view. There's no way that this Bobcats roster can add Jason Terry and David Lee and stay under the luxury tax. If we're somehow able to move Diaw for a smaller contract though, that's a different story.

This, and one of Diaw's suitors, the Knicks, just signed a premier PF so I would scratch NY off the list of teams wanting to take on Diaw.

Furthermore, Jax has already alluded to this, but Diaw may be forced to play some point forward next year if DJ doesn't come through, so I would think that Diaw's value to the team increases if Felton isn't around and all indications are that Felton is gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly the type of thing he would have done here. The excuse people were stannin’ so hard claiming he would have looked just as bad. Just not true. 
    • Yes and there aren't 32 starting QBs in the league either. Too many teams and too many games. The NFL has regressed over the years and game quality is lacking. The other leagues are supposed to be farm leagues but it doesn't matter. You just won't have 32 no matter what they do. The move to super athletes playing QB at all levels has lead to this. It used to be those guys played other positions but now they are QBs who can't really QB.  It has a trickle down effect too. OL can't block because they never had to. The fact that in today's game your QB must be able to run at least a little to survive is evidence of this as well. IMO they have ruined the game same as with the NBA. It's been simplified to the point of being boring.  Just look at the top 10 this season. Patrick Mahomes (Chiefs) Joe Burrow (Bengals) Josh Allen (Bills) Lamar Jackson (Ravens) Dak Prescott (Cowboys) Jalen Hurts (Eagles) Brock Purdy (49ers) Jordan Love (Packers) Justin Herbert (Chargers) Matthew Stafford (Rams) Once we get to number 5 the stats look like this: 167 262 1,845 63.7 7.0 10 8 65 18 84.5   47.5   10 TDs and 8 INTs??? At number 5??? There was a time not that long ago that he wouldn't even be a starter.   
    • I'm not convinced that the NFL is any better or worse at developing QBs now than they were 20 years ago.  I mean I'm sure there are some developmental issues at play, just not sure it is any different than it has been. The biggest difference IMO is that NFL teams are waaaaaaaay more willing to invest a 1st round pick into a QB now than they were 15-20 years ago.  A guy like Colin Kaepernick would probably be a top 5 pick in 2025, whereas he went in the 2nd in 2011.  Would a guy like Trey Lance go top 3 in 2010?  Hell no.  Look at Russell Wilson - he didn't go until the 3rd round.  The standard for being a 1st round QB has dropped. So it may seem like we're seeing more high-profile busts at the position, but we're also seeing teams reach for QBs way more than they have in the past.  Someone with Anthony Richardson's college resume doesn't go in the top 3 20 years ago.  
×
×
  • Create New...