Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bring in Cowher


Gazi

Recommended Posts

I'll take the loser that learns. Does Fox do that? This team is the same team for 7 years now. The only time it dominated on defense was when Del Rio was here. It almost feels like Fox has coasted on Del Rio's success.

it feels like it because he has. it's clear at this point that fox and trgo don't know how to make a dominate defense in game planning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take the loser that learns. Does Fox do that? This team is the same team for 7 years now. The only time it dominated on defense was when Del Rio was here. It almost feels like Fox has coasted on Del Rio's success.

Not to mention, they dont have any clue how to use Peppers. Everybody on the team is a character player. Never playing to a players strength always making them blend into the scheme. i've said it before we do less with more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention, they dont have any clue how to use Peppers. Everybody on the team is a character player. Never playing to a players strength always making them blend into the scheme. i've said it before we do less with more.

You may be right about this, though I am sure many fans will refuse to admit it. I have thought this same thing, but have never been able to sum it up and put it all together until now. You just may be absolutely right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way do I ever want Cowher. This guy want to be GM beside a coach if he was to take over. Beside, I don't want to wait like 10 or 15 yrs. to win a Superbowl. Do some of you guys really want to wait that long for one? :mad:

10-15 years with this group won't give us anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, after all is said and done, what's the difference between a coach that "isn't prepared, and doesn't win," and a coach that is prepared, but still doesn't win?

They're both losers.

I'll tell you the difference.

The coach that "isn't prepared and doesn't win" takes the blame for that loss. It is his fault that his team did not performe well. He may have the better team talent-wise, but his lack of preparedness ruins it.

The coach that "is prepared, but still doesn't win" has a problem with the players on the team. However, regardless of the talent, his team still comes out with the same intensity every single game. You have no instances of peak performance one week followed by absolute dogcrap the next. The thing with this type coach is that . . . the players can be changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...