No nice toys

[Stingray3030]

21 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I really don't see anybody that any team is going to go crazy for to trade up for. Lord knows I've been wrong before,  although i just don't see it.

I could definitely see someone wanting to move up from 12-20 to our spot for some of these guys.  That isn't a huge move for some of them.  Guys like Warren, Burden, TMac, Pearce, Starks, Jeanty, Green, Dart all could be luring a trade.  I'm not saying I would do it, but it has happened plenty of times before to justify the possibility.

[Stingray3030]

3 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Do a couple of realistic trade back options in the simulators. You always end up happier than sticking and picking.  Not to mention you usually end up still with the guy you wanted. We're just in a bad spot.

Perfect example - I can get this on a regular on multiple simulators (take them for what they are worth of course).  If this was the first 4 picks for us I am more than thrilled:

[shaqattaq]

On 3/2/2025 at 7:33 AM, chknwing said:

If a QB is there, we can get a decent haul

One of the top 2 OT's should still be there, so that could be a trade option.

[Jon Snow]

1 minute ago, shaqattaq said:

One of the top 2 OT's should still be there, so that could be a trade option.

I'm guessing it would take Howard falling to 8 for that to happen. Ideally 3 qb's, Carter, Howard, Hunter and Warren are off the board when we pick. I'm hoping the Jags take Warren. That could put Graham into play. But if only 1 qb goes top 10 we may be left with a lot of maybe good talent.

[shaqattaq]

On 3/2/2025 at 12:46 PM, toldozer said:

Some one may want to trade up to take the 3rd qb ahead of the saints. I could see the seahawks having some interest 

Their 18 and 82 for our 8? Maybe.

Their 18 and 50? Hell yeah!!