Vincent Jackson on the trading block

[TerriblePizza]

LaFell, Edwards, and Smith. That's were its at.

[rayzor]

it won't happen and i'm not a bit upset by it.

sure, it would be great to have him here but it just isn't going to happen. the price tag will be way too high as far as what vjax will want and what san diego will want for him. for a team going on the cheap and who just invested a good few picks on the WR position i wouldn't expect anything much to change at WR.

they want to see what they have in these young guys and i can't say i blame them.

[Ricky Spanish]

pointless to go after him. we don't spend money and we (somewhat) covet or draft picks.

[Panthro]

In a hearbeat. With Smith's injuries and complete unknowns at WR. It makes almost too much sense for us to do.

I'd send 2011's 1st for him. Lock him up long term....do it.

[Cyclonus]

The fact that Vincent Jackson had a pair of DUIs, a pending suspension (of one to four games),may scare some teams off.

Jared Allen had the same problem. Minnesota had the balls to make the deal and it has paid off.

LaFell, Edwards, and Smith. That's were its at.

Unproven rookie with questionable hands, unproven rookie being converted from QB to WR, Stud who doesn't have a lot of great years left.

The Panthers have an opportunity to go get an absolute stud who is proven. After trying to get a #2 for 5 years, they need to pull the trigger and get Jackson.

[Ricky Spanish]

In a hearbeat. With Smith's injuries and complete unknowns at WR. It makes almost too much sense for us to do.

I'd send 2011's 1st for him. Lock him up long term....do it.

(Alan Iverson voice)

we're talking about the PANTHERS. Not the Redskins, NOT the REDSKINS

but the panthers

the panthers man...

the panthers.

we don't do cool stuff like that

[cookinbrak]

Unproven rookie with questionable hands, unproven rookie being converted from QB to WR, Stud who doesn't have a lot of great years left.

Unproven QB situation. If we're to pick up a name player, I'd rather it be on defense.

[DaCityKats]

makes to much sense, so it will not happen. he is under 30 as well so he would fit in.

[DaCityKats]

Unproven QB situation. If we're to pick up a name player, I'd rather it be on defense.

i seriously doubt we do that too

[Boltergeist]

you guys should be making us a deal on Jackson after allowing us to rape ourselves on the Whitehurst deal!!!!!!

Nah, we'd just bend you over again.

And if Jackson is dealt, that would just add to our chest, since we have a 1st, 2nd, 2 3rds (SEA as well), and a 3rd that could be a 2nd (NYJ). Throw in any comp we get for Jackson, and we'd be a major player in 11.

Chicago may be a rumored team of interest too.

[Boltergeist]

Unproven QB situation. If we're to pick up a name player, I'd rather it be on defense.

But a Jackson acquisition would accelerate that learning curve.

[Frizzy350]

if we were gonna get a big name receiver we would have just gotten marshal, hes much better than jackson

[thefuzz]

if we were gonna get a big name receiver we would have just gotten marshal, hes much better than jackson

Better...maybe.

Much better..not a chance.

Take a look at Jacksons YPC from the last two seasons. That man can stetch the field, and is badass in the Red Zone.

[PantherProfessor]

any team would take jackson over Marshall