Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Vick's co-defendent shot @ Vick's Bday party


Montsta

Recommended Posts

Im late to this thread but Ive noticed a trend. When Vick does something positive or is the news for something good (like wanting to play in our city and for our franchise) the Vick filter comes on and we're STRONGLY discouraged from speaking on him. But the second his name is associated with trouble or something negative its OK to talk about him and some of yall are more than willing to stand on a soap box. Why is that? And then yall get mad at me when I say some of yall hate black quarterbacks more than you love the game of football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes...We are all animals.... But if you think your dogs life is just as important as your brother, child or a random stranger. There is clearly something wrong with you.

Then there is something clearly wrong with me, because I value my dogs life 1,000,000x more than yours. In fact, if I was commuting to work and saw you trapped in a burning car, the only thought I'd give you is being pissed off that you were causing a traffic jam and making me late.

If you want to melt your GI Joe's with a magnifying glass, that's your perogotive, but saying that dogs are property to be treated however the owner pleases is just wrong and misguided. Dogs have feelings. They know fear. They have basically unconditional love and loyalty.

I've met MANY people in my life that deserved to get the poo beat out of them, myself included. Haven't met too many dogs that got beat up and I said to myself, "Meh, that dog had it coming."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im late to this thread but Ive noticed a trend. When Vick does something positive or is the news for something good (like wanting to play in our city and for our franchise) the Vick filter comes on and we're STRONGLY discouraged from speaking on him. But the second his name is associated with trouble or something negative its OK to talk about him and some of yall are more than willing to stand on a soap box. Why is that? And then yall get mad at me when I say some of yall hate black quarterbacks more than you love the game of football.

Because you often act like Michael Vick is the only black quarterback in football, and disliking him is equivalent to hating black QBs. That makes about as much sense as saying dislike of Jake Delhomme equals hating white QBs.

I'll break down some of the guys playing right now, but in a separate thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just skimmed over this thread but this is what I took away...

Lmao.

All in all, you have to wonder if we're just a very advanced form of cancer.

We're a virus, constantly evolving to keep ourselves alive while draining our host of resources! RAWRR.

Dogs? They don't do anything bad (unless coerced to.. by humans.) It's very depressing that they'd probably still love their owners unconditionally even when treated the way Vick and his cohorts treated theirs.

THAT ONLY PROVES THEY ARE WEAK! WEAAAAK!

Dockery....Where's the speech to these silly people?

I'm off the clock right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...