Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Contract Extension - Hypothetical


ECHornet
 Share

Recommended Posts

I would make Young play out his rookie contract, If he continues to play well then use the 5th year option. If he plays at a high level for the next 3 years, I would give him a contract then. He's got a lot to prove before getting a huge payday.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Verge said:

Doesn't make sense for either side. 

IF the Panthers front office feels Bryce is the future, of course it makes sense to lock him in for longer and cheaper. 
 

IF Bryce’s camp is concerned about his first 1&1/3 years of play making his future uncertain, it could make sense for them to lock in more guaranteed millions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

IF the Panthers front office feels Bryce is the future, of course it makes sense to lock him in for longer and cheaper. 
 

IF Bryce’s camp is concerned about his first 1&1/3 years of play making his future uncertain, it could make sense for them to lock in more guaranteed millions. 

Why would they panic after the first two seasons when there's another two left for them to build value? Why would the team get out of the already affordable rookie contract just to lock it down?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, he's not even eligible for a contract yet.  You have to play three years.

And thank goodness!

All we saw last year were glimpses.  Yes, those glimpses were enough that I think every fan wants to see him come back next year.  But bottom line is that so far, with only a couple games worth of exceptions, he hasn't yet shown that he's a FRANCHISE QB.  He hasn't shown the consistent ability to elevate the players around him.

He could be the guy.  After week two of this year, just saying that much is a massive, massive positive swing.  But let's see him put it together for 17 games.  Let's see him make the people around him BETTER.  Then we can talk about extending him.

Let's not lose sight of the fact that thus far in his career, in no season has BY exceeded the rookie stats of MAC JONES.

We should  be excited for the possibility, but we certainly haven't seen yet what we need to see to declare we have our guy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jumping the gun by a mile this would be like extending a wr who has a 100 yard game or a rb with 100 yard game.  Bryce has had what 2 300 yard games in 2 years.  His horrific games outweigh his ok games and he has had like 4 good games.  This year is big for him and the panthers. 

Edited by fanpanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An incentive based, non-guaranteed contract makes the most sense for the situation but it would make cap management a pain and Bryce might prefer to just test the market when the time comes. In short: it's too soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BrianS said:

But let's see him put it together for 17 games.  Let's see him make the people around him BETTER.

This is the head coach's job, not the quarterback's. Bryce can't go in the defensive huddle and remind Chandler Wooten to wrap up when he's tackling a running back. And offensively, what can he do that makes Hubbard, Thielen, Coker or an offensive lineman better? His performance is all I'm thinking about when considering a contract extension.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, chknwing said:

not yet, but we are drafting a qb, possibley ewers in the 3rd to keep a flame under youngs fanny

This isn't a good year to waste a third round draft pick on a 3rd string QB. That would be an incredibly foolish decision.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I complete disagree. Who is available is extremely relevant. If you have a couple of players you would be happy with and you can still get them if you trade back, you should do that in a heartbeat. Being afraid that people will lowball you next year is an odd stance. Then you just say no next year, problem solved. In this particular draft you can get a very good player at 46. But to each their own.
    • I don't think so.  Watson really screwed them up.  I see something happening, but do not know what.  Cousins could be had in a trade--but they liked Flacco when he played there.  If it were me, I would not spend the #2 pick on Sanders.  I would go after a tier 2 qb because I think Will Howard is going to start in the NFL soon, and I think Ewers was rated very high at the beginning of the year--he knows adversity and he beat out a Manning while taking Texas to 2 playoff appearances.  I am not good at picking QBs, but I think Howard's run pass option and his accuracy is going to help someone.  Stay in Ohio and play for the Browns behind Flacco--
    • After Cam at #1, there are three or four elite players and there could be a trade--If I am the Giants and I am needed a winning season badly and I have several needs, I might trade out and pick up mid first and an extra second rounder, including a QB--while nobody is going to move up to #3 for Sanders, they might for Carter or Hunter.  If the Giants then move back, Sanders could still be in play.  That could be the trade in the top 3.  New England wants Campbell and I get that; Jacksonville at #5 could move back if someone wants Graham or Jeanty.  But barring some trade, the top 4 are probably locked in. So it could be 2 hours into the draft before we get any surprises. Nice list, by the way--you nailed it.
×
×
  • Create New...