Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If you haven't seen "The Blind Side" yet...


Jangler

Recommended Posts

It is a very good movie, I thought. But the best reason to see it is...

Sandra Bullock's Ass!!!!

the-blind-side-poster-1.jpg

Damn, Jesse James is a fool. And after watching her ass for two hours I am now convinced of that. So, if you like Sandy you will love it. Plus she looks pretty good as a blonde.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah really....I mean her ass is epic! And she is pretty good in it.

I am probably in the minority but Sandra Bullock is not an attractive woman. She has something about her that irks me also......although I admit I did see her in Speed and Forces of Nature which were tolerable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who is ure fav actress? johnny?

You mean besides Dakota Fanning and Miley?

Honestly that is probably half the reason...there really isn't an actress out there that makes me want to see a certain movie because they are in it, but they can make me not see a movie. Merryl Streep is the only one that I can think of that might make me consider seeing a movie because she is in it.

If Witherspoon or Aniston are in a movie.....I already know it is a movie my wife would like which means I would hate it.

Sandra at least does take on different roles but like I said...she just irks me. I would have seen the Blind Side if she wasn't in it.....I know I am in the minority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is that desperate way of thinking. Yes, can Ward and Sanders might be the top two quarterbacks going into next year‘s draft but that is only a small part of the rebuild phase for this team. You’re talking about switching back to a 43 defense and going out and trying to get a 43 edge rusher, but we’re gonna have a hard time finding that in free agency versus going after them in the draft. There is a lot more defensive players on the front end of this upcoming draft and there is decent offensive players. So if we can get into bed with a team that falls in love with one of these quarterbacks we can potentially get a hall of draft picks if we trade back.  Then we start building that defense and a gap quarterback for the time being. There is a lot more quarterbacks that are worth more in the 2026 draft and there is this year‘s draft so if we play the game and keep building this team up that way a rookie quarterback can succeed in year one and not hope to succeed in your two or three with a  treacherous year one. A good run game and a good defense helps a rookie quarterback extremely. Hopefully with Brooks, the run game will be secured and if we use next year‘s free agency and draft to secure the defense, a rookie quarterback in 2026 can be successful.
    • Of all the fancy tools used in player evaluation, it ALWAYS comes down to the eye test. Far, far from perfect but it is still the most reliable test going. This team under Tep has repeatedly ignored that one most. Crucial. Aspect. It’s like they lose the forest through the trees. Analytics works… when the data inputs are complete. Problem is that there will always be variables that are unique to that particular situation. 
    • No, we don't need to play him anymore.  It is like needles to the eyes to constantly see him just suck, it reminds us more and more of the debacle we are in. Just cut bait with the bum. he is not NFL starter material.
×
×
  • Create New...