Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

World Cup is here

Ja Rhule

By Ja Rhule,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Matt Foley Newbie

Matt Foley

Posted
Posted

I do, and it does....but that doesn't make it right Del!

Hockey replays can fricken take forever...but if you are the team or cheering for the team that gets screwed without the replay...it's worth the time!

See...Dallas vs. Buffalo, Stanley Cup Finals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pstall Newbie

pstall

Posted
Posted

They need to do something about the strechers too. A bit of overkill for nothing.

It gets to the stoppage time and that is just as funky.

I also say bring back the silver goal at least for OT as well. Golden goal is a bit abrupt. So maybe total score after 15 or 20 is more fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scutty Newbie

Scutty

Posted
Posted

It must be slipping my mind. Which game did England win thanks to a refereeing mistake?

You can't be referring to '66 for Roger Hunt said the ball was clearly over the line :P

Btw Miaoww England FA should hire Nelsen to coach their next breed of centre backs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • strato
      If you wanted Danny Dimes here’s the chance

      By strato · Posted

      Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • LinvilleGorge
      2024 College Football Thread

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...