Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

World Cup is here


Ja  Rhule

Recommended Posts

Calls will always be missed. Although I wouldn't mind them to have review but keep the play going. They do it in hockey sometimes when a goal isn't called correctly and the ref thinks it went off the post.. but it actually crossed the line. They will review it in Toronto and send word down and correct it mid-game pretty quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Delhommey, soccer isn't a sport that needs to be slowed down with excessive replays and reviews, it takes away from the nature of the game. However, officials should be able to overturn calls, especially on such a blatant error.

The score would have been 4-2 anyways. Deutschland advances!

Already slobbering over Germany v. Argentina. Argentina has a better team overall, but both teams are very similar tactically and play a great passing game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard someone moaning away about how England were robbed etc etc. It was then someone pointed out to him that his team won a game thanks to a referees mistake. He sat there with a wry grin on his face.

What goes around comes around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a goal, SOMETHING has to be put in place. It won't take any more time than the lame stretcher coming out for a hang nail. Look at the time Ghana killed the other day. Have a sensor in place. Radio the ref, yay or nay play on. Very simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Delhommey, soccer isn't a sport that needs to be slowed down with excessive replays and reviews, it takes away from the nature of the game. However, officials should be able to overturn calls, especially on such a blatant error.

The score would have been 4-2 anyways. Deutschland advances!

Already slobbering over Germany v. Argentina. Argentina has a better team overall, but both teams are very similar tactically and play a great passing game.

What if Germany had won 2-1? Would you still say that?

For a goal, SOMETHING has to be put in place. It won't take any more time than the lame stretcher coming out for a hang nail. Look at the time Ghana killed the other day. Have a sensor in place. Radio the ref, yay or nay play on. Very simple.

I agree.... JakeFlake reiterated what I had said, having a few extra officials, especially at an event this large, is just common sense. One guy sitting at the net on that play would have instantly saw that it was a goal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As soon as they start stopping the game, they'll shove in commercials. Then it's a quick trip to the dumbest thing ever invented in sport: the TV timeout.

The NFL is all about greed. The timeout after a kickoff, when you just came out of one for the kickoff, is the biggest bunch of crap on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Delhommey, soccer isn't a sport that needs to be slowed down with excessive replays and reviews, it takes away from the nature of the game. However, officials should be able to overturn calls, especially on such a blatant error.

The score would have been 4-2 anyways. Deutschland advances!

Already slobbering over Germany v. Argentina. Argentina has a better team overall, but both teams are very similar tactically and play a great passing game.

You don't understand football at all do you. If England equalize there, it's 2-2 and the dynamic of the game changes.

As it stayed 2-1, England had to push men forward and leave themselves susceptible to the counter attack - which is exactly what happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I heard someone moaning away about how England were robbed etc etc. It was then someone pointed out to him that his team won a game thanks to a referees mistake. He sat there with a wry grin on his face.

What goes around comes around.

It must be slipping my mind. Which game did England win thanks to a refereeing mistake?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...