Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dane Jackson released


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I also thought this was a solid signing but nice to see a pivot quickly rather than our usual hubris of "well we are smarter" and a double down.

I still believe Dan is an average or above average pro personnel guy. I just wish he had any clue in the draft.

I think picks 3-5 were on point--nothing spectacular, but solid.  But XL was the WR I was hoping we would not pick--to me, he was the fool's gold--and I would never have drafted a Rb with the second round pick--we had other more pressing needs. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I think picks 3-5 were on point--nothing spectacular, but solid.  But XL was the WR I was hoping we would not pick--to me, he was the fool's gold--and I would never have drafted a Rb with the second round pick--we had other more pressing needs. 

It looked too much like a Fitterer draft. 

Didn't terribly care for Wallace but he looks like there could be something there. 

At the end of the day, you can't hope to make your hay in the draft on rounds 3-5 and whiff in the first and second.

I hope he does way better this year.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I also thought this was a solid signing but nice to see a pivot quickly rather than our usual hubris of "well we are smarter" and a double down.

I still believe Dan is an average or above average pro personnel guy. I just wish he had any clue in the draft.

Great observation. Previous GMs could have improved their draft results by just opening up the huddle. It’s sad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, imminent rogaine said:

Great observation. Previous GMs could have improved their draft results by just opening up the huddle. It’s sad. 

It is sad. I have people chimping out over the suggestion that Huddle consensus has been better than our franchise at draft evaluations but, quite frankly, it has been.

It's not just sad, it's maddening. How is this possible??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...