Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Suprisingly, Connor not being asked to compete for starting SLB spot


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Diggs only had 39 playing out of the SAM position last year. Just throwing that out there. Anderson would nearly have to triple Diggs' productivity to reach 100 tackles, provided that the scheme didn't change.

Yeah, I understand that he would be switching sides, but he just flat out a ball hawk. It is unbelievable how fast and aggressive he is. Six of the games he played this year he had six tackles or more. He just really impresses me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I understand that he would be switching sides, but he just flat out a ball hawk. It is unbelievable how fast and aggressive he is. Six of the games he played this year he had six tackles or more. He just really impresses me.

Maybe and time will tell. I think it is important that we note that Anderson had 3 tackles in 2008, and never more than 21 in a season before then. Maybe he has finally bulked up and figured the game out?

I think everyone will agree that the Panthers may have some trouble stopping the run this year. And I think most people would agree that Connor is better at stopping the run than Anderson. So why not play Connor in the base 4-3 packages and Anderson can play LB on 3rd downs if needed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe and time will tell. I think it is important that we note that Anderson had 3 tackles in 2008, and never more than 21 in a season before then. Maybe he has finally bulked up and figured the game out?

I think everyone will agree that the Panthers may have some trouble stopping the run this year. And I think most people would agree that Connor is better at stopping the run than Anderson. So why not play Connor in the base 4-3 packages and Anderson can play LB on 3rd downs if needed?

Okay I didn't think of that, and I really really like it. That would work. You need to get on the phone with fox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt Connor will be any better against the run than Anderson. People seem to think that there is a trade off with Anderson when I think he will be better in most aspects of the game. This system favors him a lot more than Connor.

Connor is very intelligent and technically sound but he's not very fluid of an athlete when compared to our other linebackers. He's not in the right system to showcase his abilities.

Whoever wins the job I think we'll be solid. Connor, Anderson, and Williams all have great qualities that you would look for in a linebacker. I just think Connor is at a disadvantage by playing in this system at OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...