Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Legette. Wrist surgery?


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

It might actually be harder to fail as badly as they have than it is to be simply mediocre.

I said that with Fitterer. If you looked through his picks and the trades where he gave away picks, you would actually wonder if he was a plant from Seattle intentionally trying to make us a worse team.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

Fans would not do great in free agency, however sadly a lot of fans would do better than many front offices in the draft by simply using something like Brugler’s draft guide. It is shocking how bad many front offices are in the draft. The overthinking and over analyzing is at its peak. 

In the past 7 years we wouldn’t have had to TBH. We would have been better off realizing we lost Cam, Luke and many others. It was time to do an actual rebuild and save the cap space so we could keep our “good” (huddle consensus) draft picks like extending Trey Smith and Creed Humphrey instead of having cap space to burn since the long snapper and TMJ didn’t work out. Also, have enough cap space to keep some offensive weapons like CMC and Moore because we don’t have to trade up for a QB or didn’t have to “recover” picks lost in poo trades.

One other note here is that, the consensus huddle would have jumped at the chance to get two 1sts and a 2nd for Burns. That alone would have been the best FA/trade move made in the history of the Panthers. It is 100% indisputable fact that a huddle consensus GM, from 2018 to 2024, would have done way better and we’d have a playoff contender right now. Maybe not a SB/NFC winning team but likely the best team in the NFC South rather than a hey we lost close games to the teams in the SB even though our D set a single season points allowed record.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

but we stole Terrance Marshall from New Orleans

Scary how bad the TMJ and Mingo picks were and how similar the XL pick seems to be. We’ve seen how Coker and Thielen and heck even Diontae were able to have great games with Bryce and yet we seem to draft these RAC, big, athletic projects instead of guys like Downs and McConkey. It’s almost bizarre but it seems like we got the worst of the Seattle brain trust that just want to find the next Wilson or Metcalf or ignore the OL until it physically hurts. It takes too long even when we finally do something right and then you realize we’ve got a good OL but now we give up 30 points per game.

This draft better be a multi-bagger.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPA in the first round gives the best chance of getting a potential all pro player. All pro players, regardless of the position they play, elevate the entire team. 

Weak on d line? An all pro safety and LB will completely change the complexion. 

Weak at RB and WR. All pro center. Boom. Top 10 running game and a QB that keeps the chains going. 

Draft out of need is an over-reach the majority of the time. 

It doesn’t matter if you draft at a position you’re already strong at. Any all-pro player raises the play of the entire team. 

In the first round, it’s usually pretty damn obvious who that guy is, but this team’s kryptonite is the obvious guy. 

Hurney picked Kuechly when the team already had Jon Beason. How’d that work out? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Icege said:

I remember the Huddle consensus over the course of last season and the previous one. Lots of Bryce is a bust, we should've drafted a 4th slot WR, should've kept Wilks, should've kept an armless Cam, etc etc.

So... yea... already thought about that. I wouldn't trust the Huddle to detail my car, let alone run a multi-billion dollar professional sports team. 😛

Yeah, this is called selective memory. Go back and look at the draft threads over the past decade. It's about 95% better decisions than our FO.

But, by all means, continue to be cucked by poor decision makers. It's clearly working so well for us.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Icege said:

I remember the Huddle consensus over the course of last season and the previous one. Lots of Bryce is a bust, we should've drafted a 4th slot WR, should've kept Wilks, should've kept an armless Cam, etc etc.

So... yea... already thought about that. I wouldn't trust the Huddle to detail my car, let alone run a multi-billion dollar professional sports team. 😛

 

Huddle hive is no means perfect or even great. The point is they would be better than whatever the fug has been taking place the last 6 years. MUCH better. 

 

Plus Im sure it would no include every member, but the best. 

 

This is soo sad..

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Huddle hive is no means perfect or even great. The point is they would be better than whatever the fug has been taking place the last 6 years. MUCH better. 

 

Plus Im sure it would no include every member, but the best. 

 

This is soo sad..

That's the part the copium crowd are missing. The fact that Huddle consensus is leaps and bounds better than the Panthers FO isn't a point of pride, it's fuging rock bottom.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, this is called selective memory. 

What did I list that was untrue?

I keep hearing "the good/smart ppl" but uh... who would that be? Hopefully not the same folks that were screaming to ship Bryce off for a scratch off ticket and some jenkem. 😮

And there was a looooooot of them... 

  

2 hours ago, Basbear said:

Huddle hive is no means perfect or even great. The point is they would be better than whatever the fug has been taking place the last 6 years. MUCH better. 

Have you not seen the last 6 years of brain drain here? Knowledgeable posters have bailed in favor of other hubs.

Instead of DOGE, you could call it DOPE though. It'd be oddly fitting.

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Icege said:

What did I list that was untrue?

I keep hearing "the good/smart ppl" but uh... who would that be? Hopefully not the same folks that were screaming to ship Bryce off for a scratch off ticket and some jenkem. 😮

And there was a looooooot of them... 

  

 

Bryce hasn't proven to be a franchise QB yet, all he has done is earned another chance to prove himself.  The consensus was to draft Bryce over CJ Stroud, I still think that was the wrong move and Bryce still has to prove otherwise.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Icege said:

What did I list that was untrue?

I keep hearing "the good/smart ppl" but uh... who would that be? Hopefully not the same folks that were screaming to ship Bryce off for a scratch off ticket and some jenkem. 😮

And there was a looooooot of them... 

  

Have you not seen the last 6 years of brain drain here? Knowledgeable posters have bailed in favor of other hubs.

Instead of DOGE, you could call it DOPE though. It'd be oddly fitting.

This smells of Tepper cuckism.

But, by all means, don't let anyone get between you and the penis you so desire.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WhoKnows said:

Scary how bad the TMJ and Mingo picks were and how similar the XL pick seems to be. We’ve seen how Coker and Thielen and heck even Diontae were able to have great games with Bryce and yet we seem to draft these RAC, big, athletic projects instead of guys like Downs and McConkey. It’s almost bizarre but it seems like we got the worst of the Seattle brain trust that just want to find the next Wilson or Metcalf or ignore the OL until it physically hurts. It takes too long even when we finally do something right and then you realize we’ve got a good OL but now we give up 30 points per game.

This draft better be a multi-bagger.

Damn if only players could play for 50 years.  We could accumulate some real dogs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Qbs aren't defined by physical abilities. Brady, Brees, Manning, Montana, Warner,.....doesn't seem to correlate.  
    • https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1 https://philpeople.org/profiles/will-coinbase-refund-money-coinbase-1
    • If we are going to spend the money anyway, maybe the signing is not as bad as it seems.  Mays outperformed Corbett (before his injury and if you go back to last year, Corbett has been below average) and then Christensen took the job and Mays quickly took it from him and never looked back.  He could use improvement reaching to the next level (LBs) but picking up stunts and blitzes---he was surprisingly good.  Run blocking needs some work, but he is 25.  Corbett, in my view, should be G/C depth and if Mays steps back, he is there.  Mays should start because this team is building for the future and 30 year old players are not building blocks.  We shall see.  That is how I think about it, but there are many factors we do not know. Having said that, I like what Zavala is doing, and I do not want to bring in someone who would take opportunities away from him.  Zavala was really good at RG down the stretch, and in limited duty, was awesome. In fact, we have a guard from the PS who played briefly and did well, but he only played a few plays.  He is 25 and I recall that fans of his former team were upset when we signed him.   Maybe as the backup center only (Corbett).  You need 2 centers to run practices efficiently.  I cannot say enough about the OL coaches on this staff.  What they have done is overshadowed by the Lewis / Hunt signing.  Mays, Ekwonu, Zavala--impressive growth.
×
×
  • Create New...