Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Men that wont babysit their own kids...


TheSaint

Recommended Posts

You can't babysit your own kids.........I have always found it funny that you will never hear a woman refer to babysitting their own kids but if I man spends time with their kids while the mom is away it is babysitting. :D

And yes it is real....2 of my wife's good friends have husbands that are that way.....the wives have to bring their kids everywhere. When the girls get together for dinner, go to get their hair or nails done, grocery shopping, etc....the kids have to go with them. It is a shame not only for the wives but for the dads and kids as well. Maybe boys wouldn't grow up to be such pussies/punks and girls wouldn't grow up doing anything for the attention of a man if dad spent more time with them. Can you tell this is a pet peeve of mine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its just an excuse to get the wife to ok hiring a hot young babysitter. :)

From the time my son was born until he was 3 years old, my wife worked second shift, and while I worked during the day so that one of us would always be with him. My mom did cover the two hour overlap between her going to work and me coming home. It was rough on our sex life, but we tried to make up for it on the weekends. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love hanging with my kids. The realy early days with diapers and such I might have considered it more babysitting. But now we go everywhere and they crack me up and love my music. Win win.

Yeah once you get past the first 2-3 years its just not that hard. Just little people hanging out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't babysit your own kids.........I have always found it funny that you will never hear a woman refer to babysitting their own kids but if I man spends time with their kids while the mom is away it is babysitting. :D

And yes it is real....2 of my wife's good friends have husbands that are that way.....the wives have to bring their kids everywhere. When the girls get together for dinner, go to get their hair or nails done, grocery shopping, etc....the kids have to go with them. It is a shame not only for the wives but for the dads and kids as well. Maybe boys wouldn't grow up to be such pussies/punks and girls wouldn't grow up doing anything for the attention of a man if dad spent more time with them. Can you tell this is a pet peeve of mine?

This!

I spend as much time as I can with my daughters, which is hard sometimes because I don't live with them. I enjoy the time we spend together for two reasons; 1) every day that passes they are one day closer to leaving for college. 2) they are actually a lot of fun to hang out with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Current Draft order: 1.  Patriots 1-6 (SOS =.460)           2. Panthers 1-6 (SOS = .518) 3. Browns 1-6 (SOS =.535) 4. Titans 1-5 (SOS = .544)   Games this week that affect our current standing. Bolded Teams need to win to improve our current draft position.   Panthers @ Broncos NY Jets @ Patriots Ravens @ Browns Titans @ Lions Vikings @ LA Rams Saints @ LA Chargers Cowboys @ 49ers NY Giants @ Steelers
    • I think these reps Bryce is getting in garbage time are supposed to be somethign of a PROVE IT moment for him, except he keeps proving he is incapable of moving the ball. Bryce has shown repeatedly that with him under center, this team simply cannot score points at all. Andy can. 2 of the last 4 losses were winnable games with Andy in. I cannot remember the last time we had a winnable game with Bryce on the field.
    • I'm not saying Chubba want to resign here. To be honest I don't know why anyone would ever come to Carolina unless it was for a boat load of money and that person had no interest in winning. As for keeping Hubbard, I don't see a problems with it if the deal is reasonable pricewise. We have a 2nd round back coming off an ACL tear. We have no ide how he is going to play upon his return. These days you pretty much have to have 2 backs to ease the RB workload. The days of the 25-30 carry per game are long gone. Brooks contract is pretty cheap. If Hubbard came back around 4-5 million for 3 seasons that wouldn't break us.  And, if you did trade him at the deadline, what are you expecting in return? Most likely a 4th. Is that really going yo move the needle? Nope.  If a player want to be moved this season and you can get a good return, that's one thing. But the idea of trading "all expiring contracts today" is unreasonable. We don't have anyone on this roster who is going to fetch more than a 3rd/4th round pick. I don't see a player on our roster who is going to put another team over the hump. Furthermore, it's not like we have a FO with a good track record nailing their draft picks. If they did we wouldn't be in the current predicament.
×
×
  • Create New...