-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
(1).thumb.jpg.39d47488da35eba0b4aca548ded58784.jpg)
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
-
They stayed with TD, and that paid off. I think people are wondering if the rumored interest is indicative of their thinking. You have to know they are working the cap all day--and looking at Horn's deal. In the past, we dealt players with injury concerns--Horn has missed a season and a half. We are about to invest a lot of money in him if we keep him. Horn's CarFax report has 3 accidents on it. You buyin'? Just reading tea leaves. I think I would keep him with the new training and conditioning staff-but I hear you. -
I also think you have to look at draft depth. If a DT is the best player but you expect some good ones to be around in late round 2, do you take the edge, even though he might be a bit lower on your board, then take the DT later? They always say, "We take BPA," but would 2 starters be better than 1? Hard to say hypothetically, but if I know DTs are deep, I value them a bit less than an edge players, who I have higher on my board based on the scarcity of the talent at that position--this is, of course, if you enter the draft with needs that were not adequately addressed in free agency. If we need a DT and an Edge, for example, let's say Graham, DT Michigan is ranked 22nd on your board. There are 8 DTs expected to go later on day 2. Pearce, Edge, Tennessee, is ranked 26th on your board but there are few Edge rushers with his skill set left in the draft--let's say 1 more until the talent level drops significantly. Who do you take?
-
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.