Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Superb Owl


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Not sure the difference is that great.  KC has a little more experience, but its not like Philly experience is non existent.  

Fwiw, I think that both teams have great defenses.  KC has a better qb, but Philly has more offensive talent all around.  Could come down to special teams.  

The SB bowl experience difference is massive. Just look at the rosters and who has been and who hasn't.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The SB bowl experience difference is massive. Just look at the rosters and who has been and who hasn't.

I don't think this can be dismissed for how big of an impact it could make, in 2 particular areas.

The start of the game and halftime

KC isn't going to have any nerves at the start of this game, too many players who have been on the last 2 SB teams, while a lot of Eagles very well could have some jitters at the start, it's pretty normal for the SB.

Then the super long halftime can never be understated at how different it is for the players.  Was watching something with Belichick last night that said once when they got back to the SB after a bunch of years of not going, they specifically practiced halftime that week, taking the 30+ minute break in the middle of practices so their guys could get used to the extended break.

In a close game, those two things very well could give the Chiefs just enough of an edge to make a difference.

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The SB bowl experience difference is massive. Just look at the rosters and who has been and who hasn't.

Not saying there is no difference, but the majority of the eagles key players have been in the playoffs and the Superbowl.  Hurts, Smith, Brown, Johnson, 3 out of 5 starting oline, etc... have all been there before.  Barkley hasn't, but not sure it will matter with him.  

I mean its not like they are playing us.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I don't think this can be dismissed for how big of an impact it could make, in 2 particular areas.

The start of the game and halftime

KC isn't going to have any nerves at the start of this game, too many players who have been on the last 2 SB teams, while a lot of Eagles very well could have some jitters at the start, it's pretty normal for the SB.

Then the super long halftime can never be understated at how different it is for the players.  Was watching something with Belichick last night that said once when they got back to the SB after a bunch of years of not going, they specifically practiced halftime that week, taking the 30+ minute break in the middle of practices so their guys could get used to the extended break.

In a close game, those two things very well could give the Chiefs just enough of an edge to make a difference.

I really think that is a massively underrated aspect. KC is very, very comfortable in this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Not saying there is no difference, but the majority of the eagles key players have been in the playoffs and the Superbowl.  Hurts, Smith, Brown, Johnson, 3 out of 5 starting oline, etc... have all been there before.  Barkley hasn't, but not sure it will matter with him.  

I mean its not like they are playing us.  

The Eagles have had a ton of roster turnover since their SB 2 years ago

And there is a massive difference between other playoff games and the Super Bowl, just everything about it.  

They spend the week in town for practice, plus all the media around it.  The extended intros, extended halftime, the pressure of the moment, all of it is just different and when half of one team has done it the last 3 years, it gives them a significant advantage that not enough people take into account.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

The Eagles have had a ton of roster turnover since their SB 2 years ago

And there is a massive difference between other playoff games and the Super Bowl, just everything about it.  

They spend the week in town for practice, plus all the media around it.  The extended intros, extended halftime, the pressure of the moment, all of it is just different and when half of one team has done it the last 3 years, it gives them a significant advantage that not enough people take into account.

Yeah, I really don't think people think about this. This is a massive advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CmC2k said:

I hate that I'm having to root for the Eagles as I find their fans incredibly toxic but I'm just so tired of the blatant favoritism the NFL gives KC and Mahomes that I'd rather see the Eagles stick their finger in the eye of NFL and pull out a win. 

Pretty much yeah. After this though if the Eagles win they can kick rocks. Hopefully we'll get some different teams in there over the next few years.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They stayed with TD, and that paid off. I think people are wondering if the rumored interest is indicative of their thinking. You have to know they are working the cap all day--and looking at Horn's deal.  In the past, we dealt players with injury concerns--Horn has missed a season and a half.  We are about to invest a lot of money in him if we keep him.  Horn's CarFax report has 3 accidents on it.  You buyin'?  Just reading tea leaves.  I think I would keep him with the new training and conditioning staff-but I hear you.  
    • I also think you have to look at draft depth.  If a DT is the best player but you expect some good ones to be around in late round 2, do you take the edge, even though he might be a bit lower on your board, then take the DT later?  They always say, "We take BPA," but would 2 starters be better than 1?  Hard to say hypothetically, but if I know DTs are deep, I value them a bit less than an edge players, who I have higher on my board based on the scarcity of the talent at that position--this is, of course, if you enter the draft with needs that were not adequately addressed in free agency.  If we need a DT and an Edge, for example, let's say Graham, DT Michigan is ranked 22nd on your board.  There are 8 DTs expected to go later on day 2.  Pearce, Edge, Tennessee, is ranked 26th on your board but there are few Edge rushers with his skill set left in the draft--let's say 1 more until the talent level drops significantly.  Who do you take? 
    • Is this one of them cases where Cam's comments are taken out of context, or he just goofed up again with his words.
×
×
  • Create New...