Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Iron Man is a ripoff of Batman


Matt Foley

Recommended Posts

which he'll always do, and track you down until he kills you.

to beat him, like you said before, it would have to be someone like Scarlet Witch who just changes reality to one where he doesn't exist or some other cheap-o thing like that.

I really don't see how wolverine would regenerate if he was blown up with high explosives, then put into an incinerator. Sure, the adamantium skeleton would survive that, but none of the important fleshy parts. They would all be turned into ash and vapor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see how wolverine would regenerate if he was blown up with high explosives, then put into an incinerator. Sure, the adamantium skeleton would survive that, but none of the important fleshy parts. They would all be turned into ash and vapor.

he's survived being incinerated down to his skeleton before. during the Civil War an explosion that killed Captain Marvel and 600 people stripped Wolverine to his bones, and he healed.

he was also incinerated by the nazis in wwii.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see how wolverine would regenerate if he was blown up with high explosives, then put into an incinerator. Sure, the adamantium skeleton would survive that, but none of the important fleshy parts. They would all be turned into ash and vapor.

He can regenerate from a single cell I believe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He can regenerate from a single cell I believe.

and since you can't get inside his bones, they're always going to have living cells in them.

i do think it has gotten out of control recently, with him coming back from a skeleton before the guy even got back to his car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My .02 cents.

Batman makes a living off of defeating enemies whose strength and abilities far surpass his own. He does it on a regular basis, by using his mind. If you put Superman and Batman in a room and told them to slug it out, by all means Superman would win. But that isn't a very plausible scenario is it? If Batman wanted to take out Superman, he most certainly would be able to. How? Using his genius level intellect. He could make a trap using kryptonite that would render Superman weakened to the point where Batman could easily beat him in a fist-fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My .02 cents.

Batman makes a living off of defeating enemies whose strength and abilities far surpass his own. He does it on a regular basis, by using his mind. If you put Superman and Batman in a room and told them to slug it out, by all means Superman would win. But that isn't a very plausible scenario is it? If Batman wanted to take out Superman, he most certainly would be able to. How? Using his genius level intellect. He could make a trap using kryptonite that would render Superman weakened to the point where Batman could easily beat him in a fist-fight.

laying a trap implies that it's not a fight because one of them doesn't know about it. in a scenario where batman is mad at superman and superman has no interest in fighting, that would work.

but in a scenario where they were both interested in killing each other, it would be over before Batman did all that. faster than a speeding bullet, superman punch, exploded head, instant death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

laying a trap implies that it's not a fight because one of them doesn't know about it. in a scenario where batman is mad at superman and superman has no interest in fighting, that would work.

but in a scenario where they were both interested in killing each other, it would be over before Batman did all that. faster than a speeding bullet, superman punch, exploded head, instant death.

It becomes a fight once Superman is trapped. Unless you expect him to just sit there and take it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Super raw, not sure he is worth a top 10 pick.  Primary a pass rusher.  A bit like Burns, very fast athletic but doesnt always follow the play.  His highlights look good but when you watch him play you can see he is just raw and needs to develop
    • Personally, I am not sold on Bryce yet--and I do not think anyone is saying they are, but I don't think Ward is on table when we draft anyway.  Not even sure if I would rather have him than one of the later QBs.  I see a lot of potential in Allar, Nussmeire, Rourke, and even Hamilton from Ohio State--Milroe is intriguing, but I am not sure he is an NFL QB.  Ewers is that sleeper who falls and becomes a solid starter. I think that we sign a veteran who has played and we draft one of these project QBs. To your point:  With that in mind, I think you have to take QB off the table in round 1, and if Bryce can string 4-5 games like KC together, we still need to draft a QB in round three or so---I really think Rourke is a great fit for this offense--he is accurate and gets the ball out quickly---he impressed me vs OSU.   Reason?  I think we may have a tough decision to make about Bryce in 2 years--will he be worth $60m?  That decision is a lot easier if you have been grooming a backup for 2 years who can play. In round 1: I am hoping for PSU's edge Abdul Carter In round 2:  I would like to see us grab a DT who can rush the passer.  Walter Nolen of Ole Miss is versatile and a bit raw. I think he could be an excellent complement to Brown. In round 3:  I would love ILB Danny Stutsman from Oklahoma.  He is a beast. With 11 picks, I would package our 4th rounders to move up into the third round and take a QB.  At the moment, I think Rourke is trending upward and he has the skills Canales seems to want in a QB.  Quick processor, quick release. I would use the fifth rounders on OL.  I know that I left out WR--however, we are getting Thielen back, XL will be improved, Coker will be improved, and Moore has been surprisingly good.  Sanders (TE) has been more than expected in the passing game.  I think we need D more than WR, and maybe we can get a veteran WR to sign or find a hidden gem late.  
    • Wouldn't be surprised if he starts a couple Jets games this year with the way the Rodgers thing is going. Giants fans are pissed they didn't keep him lol. He might actually have a little bit of a market. 
×
×
  • Create New...