Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Attention Hollywood... Stay the FUG away!


Zod

Recommended Posts

This week I saw the latest A-Team trailer abomination and it made me want to vomit.

So here are things that are Holy and hollywood has no business remaking...

">" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But But But A-Team movie has a tank shooting an airplane...while in mid-air. If thats not enough to get your butt in the seat I don't know what is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't worry Zod, if Prince of Persia makes the amount of money that Disney is planning it to, then Hollywood will move from ruining old TV shows and movies to ruining video games for the next couple of years. There's already a huge list of VG movies in pre-production. From wiki:

* American McGee’s Alice

* Area 51

* Army of Two

* BioShock

* Broken Sword: The Shadow of the Templars

* Castlevania

* Citizen Siege

* City of Heroes

* Dante's Inferno

* Deus Ex

* Devil May Cry

* Doom 2

* Driver

* Duke Nukem

* Earthworm Jim

* EverQuest

* Fear Effect

* God of War

* Halo

* Hitman 2

* Hunter: The Reckoning

* Infamous

* Just Cause

* Kane & Lynch

* Lost Planet

* Mass Effect

* MechWarrior

* Medievil

* Metal Gear Solid

* Metroid

* Need For Speed

* The Neverhood

* Nightmare Creatures

* Onimusha

* Pac-Man

* Return to Castle Wolfenstein

* Shadow of the Colossus

* Silent Hill 2

* Soul Calibur

* Spy Hunter

* Star Fox

* The Sims

* The Suffering

* Tomb Raider 3

* Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell

* Uncharted: Drake's Fortune

* The Unforgettable

* World of Warcraft

Of course, some are much farther along than others, but everyones just watching to see how successful PoP is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...