Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is the most scandelous occurance that has ever taken place on this board?


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

I accused Dan Morgan of being an idiotic troll.

But I would have to vote for Greg Frey's posse showing up.

"This time I got so wasted, that Frey threw up in my mouth."

"Cornhole? What's up man? Long time no see"

"Douchey, McDouche Douche? Sup dawg. Yeah, Greg's so funny when he's Panthering!"

Very awkward times indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I accused Dan Morgan of being an idiotic troll.

But I would have to vote for Greg Frey's posse showing up.

"This time I got so wasted, that Frey threw up in my mouth."

"Cornhole? What's up man? Long time no see"

"Douchey, McDouche Douche? Sup dawg. Yeah, Greg's so funny when he's Panthering!"

Very awkward times indeed.

That was a classic - on a related note, if you have a lot of time to kill, go to thedirty.com and search for Greg Frye. The thread on Beason punching him is classic, because he and his friends must have signed in under 25 different screen names defending him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've posted on here for 6 years (wow, that's sad) and have never seen anything outrageous, of course I never actually read the "hot girls do not post on mbs" thread, just dimbees orginal post nor did i ever play survivor ( i didn't even realize it was being played at the time).

is it true that one female poster showed everyone her bewbies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawk coming out of the closet.

Wait what?

hey...what happens on the huddle, stays on the huddle!!!

There's been lots of good times here, thats for sure.

Survivor Two twisted in a pretty good scandal...and then a foreign other teamer won it all just to smooth things over!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP https://support.google.com/assistant/thread/311339676?hl=en&sjid=11489775381582229063-AP
    • When we drafted Luke, we already had Cam, Smith, Olsen, Stewart, Deangleo, Gross, Kalil, CJ, Hardy, Beason, TD, Gamble (and maybe more I'm forgetting), we had a lot of great pieces in place. Going pure BPA for a player with Luke's potential when the LB you already have is different when you already have all those pieces in place.  Our OL right now is probably in a better shape than that team and our RBs and TE have potential compared to proven vets back then, but after that, the 2012 roster was in a far better shape than we are right now. We need a #1 WR, DEs, LBs, DBs, C, and depending who you ask a QB.  Going BPA at pick #5 when that player is a DT and your current best player on either side of the ball is a DT, seems irresponsible. If he's the only player they like that high left, then you trade back and go with position of more need at a slot that makes sense for the player while adding other picks.  If you trade back and he falls because other teams don't need/want a DT, then you consider him at that point because of the value.    
    • This sounds like the same back and forth when we drafted a LB when we already had a LB or as mentioned prior back to back DLs. I want the BPA, if it is another DT so be it. (No not a kicker/punter for those people that think they are funny))
×
×
  • Create New...