Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young Panthers are Fox's Kind of Team


Recommended Posts

Remember when Fox first came to Carolina and pumped life into a franchise and then took it to a Super Bowl in his second season? What happened then was that he had a bunch of guys totally buying into his system. There was unity and harmony that translated into a lot of victories.

Yeah, that was it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox's early success, I believe, was due to the fact that he would mold the game plan to fit the talent. Now, he molds the talent to fit the game plan.

For example in 2002, he knew the offense was horrible so the defense would have to dominate the game, and they did. But he didn't have Rodney Peete throwing the ball 30 + times.

Last season, Jake threw approximately 245708935342 passes per game like it was 2005. I rarely saw him using the run game against teams that are weak against the run.

I didn't see him mold the game plan until late in the season when injuries forced his hand. The way he modified the offense to hide the huge gap created by Gross' injury was work of genius.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Fox a lot. He just needs to find a way to find use his traditional style effectively against this this new-style 'offensive' NFL league. A possible franchise QB is step one so I think he is coming along, finally, but progress nonetheless. I guess that whole ten year coaching effectiveness is out the window, why get rid of the coach when you can get rid of the team. At this rate no player will be under Fox for ten years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm really worried that if Fox doesn't get an extension that a lot of the talent hiding on this roster will disappear after this year. then it'll be another two to three years at minimum before we start making any noise again. so i'm hoping Fox does get an extension. the only problem i ever had with him was not benching Delhomme. now that he's gone, i think i'll be at ease with his play calling from now on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not Fox's kind of team. Fox's team would be sprinkled with veterans and high leadership kind of guys. This is the kind of team that brings out the best in Fox as he likes to teach and is considered a player's coach. But he would not have made these moves by himself and he definitely can't be that happy about it except for one thing.

If he can take this bunch of backups and rookies and turn them into a contender he will have proven his worth to all of the other owners and GMs out there and he will be highly sought after the season if he doesn't sign an extension to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Remember when Fox first came to Carolina and pumped life into a franchise and then took it to a Super Bowl in his second season? What happened then was that he had a bunch of guys totally buying into his system. There was unity and harmony that translated into a lot of victories."

i remember this. fox is a good coach, i hope we keep him and give him a few more seasons with this new team. I think he is on to something here.

Two words- Stephen Davis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Too late to edit above but the quote is from this Diane Russini article in the Athletic: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5941684/2024/11/23/russinis-what-im-hearing-the-day-the-jets-fell-apart-and-the-broncos-rallied-belichick-best-fits/ Okay.. there you have sorry I left that out the first post.  Also waivers keep the contract intact. That is the major difference in released and waived. It's all in that link from the other post.
    • Okay so I am reading something in The Athletic and it says that Jones had to pass through waivers. So I don't know. I looked this stuff up when we were number one there all offseason and I thought it said 4 years in the league got you vested, as they call it.  Vested gets you out of waivers as I understood it. I probably got something wrong, but when I think about the slack quality of journalism these days I wonder about that. So I went and looked, again. Well, well.  For everyone: "When a player has accrued at least four seasons in the NFL, they are considered a vested veteran. When these vested veterans get cut, they are released and their contract is terminated. When a vested veteran is released, they are an unrestricted free agent that can sign with any NFL team, and the team that released them doesn’t need to provide any additional compensation." It runs it all down here, where the quotes came from: https://www.profootballnetwork.com/waived-vs-released-nfl/ As far as Jones, the team turned down his 5th year option so I knew that meant he had 4 years in, because they re-signed him anyway, after turning down the much cheaper extra year.  The Athletic is owned by the New York Times so I shouldn't be surprised. That paper was an institution once upon a time but they let their standards go.
    • Well, we got our answer on Army today.
×
×
  • Create New...