Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mason Graham at NT?


Martin
 Share

Recommended Posts

Graham is a bit bigger that the traditional NT Evero likes to use, but he might be a great fit for the traits Evero like at that position. I’m slight intrigued by the idea, and I think Graham might be there when we pick. 
 

Jalon Walker is probably my preferred choice, but if Graham is a fit at NT…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, AU-panther said:

I hope we don't pass on a great player because of the "fit" of a coach and system that might not be here in the future.

 

100 % agree, he would be awesome as a 3-4 end, but I think he might work as a NT as well, so I was curious about other people see it. Just a very impactful player that I think might be there when we pick, but we’ll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Maybe on 3rd and long or other long yardage downs. To me he's like a classic 3tech. I don't want him trying to take on double teams, I want him in 1 vs 1. His talents would be wasted at NT and I do not think he could hold this ground as NT.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not a fan of drafting a NT in round 1. Your 3 Techs are your better athletes, in general, but there have been exceptions.

 A player that does fit the Evero mold for a NT is Walter Nolan of Ole Miss.  He is a hair under 300 and is projected to be effective at both the three tech and NT positions.  Some argue that playing him at NT is a waste of his talents, however, and a NT in round 1 is a reach, imo.  He is projected to be drafted late first.

Deone Walker out of Kentucky is a freakish athlete in that he can play every DL position and he is 6'6" and 345.  A bit raw, he has the skill set Evero covets, assuming his size is not a deal breaker. He has a second-round grade.

I have to think we try to sign a veteran or go with Shy again (hope not).  Either way, the NT they may covet (considering all other needs) is Omarr Norman-Lott, a player who could drop to the early 4th round. He is effective from the 0, 1, or 3 tech positions.  Has good first step quickness (4 sacks in 2024).  Needs to work on technique like all others, can get washed.  Smart player--high football IQ.

Finally, I would draft Tyleik Williams of Ohio State in round 2 if he were to somehow fall that far.  He is a great bull rusher and has freakish speed and power to play any DL position--from 0 to 5 tech.  He needs to work on some things, as they all do, but few have the ceiling Williams has.  I would interview him to see if he is a dawg and is willing to work hard to be the best because he has the tools to be great.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He’s the top of my board and if he is there I hope we take him. He would be BPA at a position we desperately need and I think would make a huge impact on the quality of play we see from other players in the front seven. He and DB returning would make a subpar LB group look much much better. I’m not smart enough to know about his scheme fit, but I’m more interested in culture-fit. If he really isa “dawg” and fits into the culture, I’m confident he will make a big impact. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I thought about is that when we drafted 95 a lot of the rhetoric was: never draft a DT top 10 unless they can rush the passer. Things have changed since then and interior pressure is so valuable now. However do we think Graham is the level of prospect Jalen Carter was, because if so he's a no brainer for me. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/23/2025 at 5:20 PM, Basbear said:

 

Maybe on 3rd and long or other long yardage downs. To me he's like a classic 3tech. I don't want him trying to take on double teams, I want him in 1 vs 1. His talents would be wasted at NT and I do not think he could hold this ground as NT.

 

I agree -would not play him at NT---3 or 5 tech.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's one of the most versatile DL in the draft. I do think he's a bit more of a RDE opposite of Brown, but he could play the nose because of his athleticism. I think he gives you pass rush from the interior and is definitely the most gap sound/run stuffer in the draft. Carolina could not stop the run and that must be addressed first. They've got to nail down the front 7. In the 3-4 front he's perfect though, because that DE is going to be a more athletic DT, he can play the 3 if they slide into a eagle front, and then is a perfect 4 technique. I think hes far better than A'shawn, and would be lightyears ahead of Tuttle who just tries to stalemate guys. The zero really needs to be a wardaddy and be more finesse than most think because they are 2 gapping. He's #2 for me if Abdul is gone which is very likely. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/e2eb9011-cede-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/e2eb9011-cede-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a
    • https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a https://myrbkc.rbkc.gov.uk/forums/general-discussion/31b33d57-c7de-ef11-a81b-6045bde1041a
    • 𝐂𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐫𝐲𝐩𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐚𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐨𝐭 𝐛𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐬𝐞𝐝. 𝐇𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫, 𝐢𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐮𝐧𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐫 𝐚 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐮𝐞, 𝐂𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐛𝐞 𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐩 , 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐭 📱+𝟏-(𝟖𝟑𝟏) 𝟰𝟎𝟏-𝟔𝟖𝟎𝟎 . 𝐓𝐨 𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭 𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐥𝐞𝐦, 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐰𝐞𝐛𝐬𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐩, 𝐨𝐫 𝐜𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐝𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐚𝐭 📱+𝟏-(𝟖𝟑𝟏) 𝟰𝟎𝟏-𝟔𝟖𝟎𝟎𝐖𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐟𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧’𝐭 𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐞𝐝, 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐂𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐲 𝐠𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦 𝐚 𝐛𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐬𝐭. 𝐀𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐲𝐬 𝐝𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐞-𝐜𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐢𝐝 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐬.  
×
×
  • Create New...