FOX remaining QB rankings

[HSCBandit07]

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/pgStory?contentId=9044262&MSNHPHMA#sport=NFL&photo=9043814

Since they call it playoff QB rankings I wish they would rank based on playoff performance but oh well 5 isn't bad

typo in Delhomme's though that says "He's a guy you can never count out, one of those guys who simply knows how to win"

writer should be smacked for that one

[DuMaCacAZ]

Warner at 1, Fitz on SI?!?! this is just great. i dont like this. seems to be bad ju ju for the cards.

[HSCBandit07]

my apoligies not a typo...i thought it read "count on"

[the butch]

I'll take 5th. That's pretty accurate I would say.

[Carolina Husker]

I think 5 seems right. Maybe #4 ahead of Eli, but that's about where I would rank him.

[Kyle82]

I'll take Jake in the playoffs anytime

:party:

[UNCrules2187]

Delhomme won't win a shootout? The only reason his numbers are down is because he's actually got a run game to rely on so he doesn't NEED to win a shootout. I think his '04 season proved he has the abilities to win a shootout if necessary.

[tayncat]

Yea i like the ranking. I truly think thats more accurate. Im thinking about the ranking when the wild card teams was in there and Delhomme was ranked 11. That was pure nonsense!

[Ncstatefan]

I'm fine with it

[Debil]

I think it's all B.S., really. What the hell does the writer mean by "effectiveness". Seems to me Jake's been pretty effective for the most part - at least where we needed him to be.

Besides, this doesn't take into account the so-called "intangibles"... like Jake's ability to rally the offense to a last second win, or the choke factor for McNabb, or Phillip Rivers' love of pissing off opposing fans by smack-talking at them from behind the bench.

[rodeo]

why on earth would the writer leave the league MVP out?

oh wait...