Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final PFF Grades


mav1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

 

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

So far i have just seen that talent beats everything, Most of these games were blowouts because the other teams just dont have the heavy hitter players. 

The Vikings were 5th in ppg allowed and got beat by a team with more talented individual players at the positions that matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to be overly critical because it's too early to judge some of these guys (and I have to keep telling myself that), but they could do a much better job of actually drafting players. If we have another draft like the last, it will be one helluva red flag.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

I bet Evero gets canned at the end of next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think he had some VERY bad games, mixed with some good ones. 

Honestly bad safety play is to blame IMO. We had safeties reacting too slowly or missing their assignments in which Horn was chasing after their guy. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, that defense unit is compete ass. I think the CB group is decent-ish and grade out worse than they really are due to zero pressure from the front 7 and no safety help. But damn that entire DLine, LBer and safety group, just utter garbage tier.

Also think giving Jewell an $18.75 million contract to be a bottom tier LBer doesn't get talked about enough.

I also remember saying around mid-season that Coker should be ahead of XL on the depth chart, and nothing has happened to change my mind since. Forcing a ton of snaps and targets to XL despite his poor play has been a real determent to the team.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I think he had some VERY bad games, mixed with some good ones. 

But but I was told on another thread he was as good as Surtain and he deserved top cb money   I like JC but I don’t understand some people’s infatuation like he does no wrong he does plenty wrong hence 57th out of 116 

 All pro or not I remember trai turner making it one year when he was up for a contract. Then he got paid and fat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have been on the Bech bandwagon since well before the SR Bowl.  Hoping that he would stay a hidden gem and we'd be smart enough to grab him late.  I just don't think Morgan cares as much about WR as we do
    • No one had posted in a month.  I don't think any of us were watching
    • Here is how this draft could get mind-blowingly complicated--Interesting comment about Jags floating the Jeanty idea to lure Chicago into a trade.  I have to think Ben Johnson is going to duplicate in many ways the success he had in Detroit, and I have to think their free agency was following the blueprint Carolina designed last year (one that the Saints designed before them with Brees) and they upgraded all of their interior linemen.  RT in Chicago is set; Johnson loves RT Darnell Wright.  However, at LT, Braxton Jones is coming off a December injury and is considered to be in a competition for the position this year by at least a few fans on the Bears Wire.  His PFF score, however, was solid, posting an 80+ score in pass protection and 70+ score in run blocking.  He is in his prime.  However, in some of their fan mocks, the Bears are taking a LT.  I thought they needed an Edge to play 4-3 strong side across from Sweat, but they signed Odeyingbo to a pretty big contract in March. For the Bears, in my view, it comes down to TE or Running Back. Kmet is their #1 TE and he had 474 yards in that role, which was 25th in the NFL last season for TEs.  Adding Warren would help upgrade the TE spot and give them the ability to add around an estimated 80 yards of production per game.  The Bears have D'Andre Swift at RB, but could use a RB to pair with him for a desired 2 RB attack.  So if I am Da Bears, I stay at 10 and take Warren.  If the Jags want to move on from Etienne, then they will take Jeanty. I think, if I were the Jags (with 10 picks this year) I would take Mason Graham and not try to get an 11th pick.  It is a need position, and it seems to me the only reason they are toying with the idea of moving on from Etienne is because Jeanty is on the board.  That, to me, would be a luxury pick. New GM, I think he does not get cute--they take Graham if they stay at 5.  I might say the Jags' biggest need is Corner.  #5 is too rich for Will Johnson, but remember, they have 10 picks.  could they move up with Cleveland and take Hunter, giving them a CB and WR threat?  To me, with the draft capital they have, that is the move they should make.  Cleveland then could move back to #5.  Remember, Nick Chubb is an aging (29) free agent coming off an injury--so he is gone.  With an additional second rounder, the Browns move back and take Jeanty to give Flacco a running game. The Jags pick is very interesting, but I would not be surprised to see them move up. 
×
×
  • Create New...