Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final PFF Grades


mav1234
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

 

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

There's too many ifs that must go right to have much of a turn around. I'm not expecting much of an improvement on defense. It's just too bad. On offense there may or may not be any difference at all. There will be more chemistry between Young and his receivers but will it be enough to offset a terrible defense. I think you've seen throughout the playoffs how important a defense is to winning games. 

So far i have just seen that talent beats everything, Most of these games were blowouts because the other teams just dont have the heavy hitter players. 

The Vikings were 5th in ppg allowed and got beat by a team with more talented individual players at the positions that matter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not going to be overly critical because it's too early to judge some of these guys (and I have to keep telling myself that), but they could do a much better job of actually drafting players. If we have another draft like the last, it will be one helluva red flag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Definitely not going to improve a ton on the Defensive side as we kept the same coach.

Look for marginal defensive improvements at best. The offense can be decent if we add another playmaker. 

I bet Evero gets canned at the end of next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • There wasn't a moment of the day that I couldn't at least hear helicopters.
    • Spoken like someone who hasn't watched nearly enough of T-Mac other than a few short highlight clips to know his game. The only thing he doesn't have is the short area quickness in the way that you're looking for, as you seem to want that Jefferson/Chase type of WR, which sure, he's not that. But him and XL are nothing alike, let alone having the same strengths and weaknesses.  In particular, T-Mac's #1 strength is LITERALLY XL's #1 weakness, their hands.  T-Mac has vice grips for hands, catches darn near everything, and does it all with hands catches, the opposite of XL.   Beyond that, you mention prioritizing route running, of which, T-Mac already runs a complete NFL route tree at a high level.  Yes, he needs to work on his get off the line at the snap and get a little crisper on some of his cuts to create separation, but again, all players need to work on something, that's just what his is.  It doesn't change that he is already a great route runner, there are just some small elements of it that he can improve on. Even then, it's like I've been saying, the trade off of not having that true elite separation like the smaller WR's get, is how good he is at using his body to keep the DB's from being able to break up passes and just making contested catches in general.  You lose a little bit of separation, but his 6'5" body gives him advantages that the smaller WRs just don't have. Again, your post here insinuates that T-Mac is a slow, plodding big WR who isn't a proficient route runner, which couldn't be further from the truth.  I have no issue with people wanting other players over T-Mac, or just not wanting him at all.  But they need to be logical reasons, not made up ones in your head because you don't actually know the player and his abilities.
    • I'm pretty sure that was the best season he's ever gonna have.  
×
×
  • Create New...