Dwayne Jarrett to be cut *rumor*

[Brooklyn Bully]

If it's true it's like what the other guy just said, we're a "nice" organization. If you have no faith in him, cut ties now, let him go to another team and work with them in camp. No reason to waste our time and his.

[Sword]

they don't want to bother having to throw it to him in the mini camps when armanti edwards needs all the reps he can get

[SmootsDaddy89]

Why not bring him into training camp and let them all compete. No need to get down to a 53 man roster by the end of April. It just doesn't make much sense in my eyes, but if he has a credible source then i respect that and thanks for the heads up.

Our coaches have seen him for three years now, they know what he can do more or less. If they think he doesn't have a chance it'd be better to cut ties now and let him catch on with pete carroll

[Udogg]

I doubt it. Source or no source.

[Snake]

I really dont understand that move if they do. I mean yea he is not a #2 but your telling me he is not any better then the #4 even without seeing them compete.

[holycrikey]

Honestly, it'd make sense. Jarrett had his opportunities. I'd still like to see him get a chance at #3 slot, but meh. I think we've got a good group going forward. Losing Jarrett won't be a problem.

[Sword]

maybe here is the real answer

Fox: how's jarret's progress coming?

SteveSmith@Fox

Bitch got ta go

[nagai]

Why would they cut him at such a bad time? Wait till training camp or something first, let him prove his case, then you can pass judgement.

[carpanfan96]

Why would they cut him at such a bad time? Wait till training camp or something first, let him prove his case, then you can pass judgement.

I think they already have, when they Took LaFell. He's a more physical receiver and shouldn't have problems getting off the line. Also a better run blocker. Much more upside imo as well.

[blackcat]

Why would they cut Jarret? They're paying him sh&t, and they have noone else...so they're gonna have 89 and a bunch of nothing....Jarrets here until the end of the season.

[panthersphan]

We really shouldn't cut hit now...at least let him play in 2010...hell he at least caught a TD in the last game with Moore throwing to him.

So we're going with LaFell as our #2? I wouldn't support this move.

[panthersphan]

maybe here is the real answer

Fox: how's jarret's progress coming?

SteveSmith@Fox

Bitch got ta go

:rofl:

Funny thing is, I could see it happen...

[Brooklyn Bully]

I'm tired of the "Saints TD" argument. YES, I do not want LaFell as our #2...but jesus, people, Jarrett barely made it over the goal line for his only ever TD against Saints back-ups.

[House]

I really dont understand that move if they do. I mean yea he is not a #2 but your telling me he is not any better then the #4 even without seeing them compete.

Jarrett IS GOING TO GET CUT.

Apparently after the draft, the FO and Fox had all the WR's they drafted take a test. It was a litmus test. If you passed, you stayed on the team, if you failed you got cut.

They drew this up on the whiteboard

y z ooCooTE x

The question was: You are z, do you line up on the ball or off the ball?

Jarrett was the only one who could not answer the question. He got confused and asked if he could "phone a friend".