Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers take Tony Pike


Swarly

Recommended Posts

No question that he's the best available. Probably was with our last two picks as well. Can't hate the pick. Clausen or Pike will pan out, the other will get traded for better value than where they were drafted.

Bank on it.

yeah. We're definitely trying to get talent that can become great trade values imo. We're making relatively smart moves and I really don't mind this draft. LaFell, Edwards, & Gettis all have a ton of potential with LaFell capable of becoming a solid starter for us. And now this: Moore/Clausen/Pike three different QBs that will sure bring the best out in each other by simply being on the team. Please remain calm people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No question that he's the best available. Probably was with our last two picks as well. Can't hate the pick. Clausen or Pike will pan out, the other will get traded for better value than where they were drafted.

Bank on it.

Pike was pretty much an insurance pick. We finally have 3 legit QB's to choose from. One will be a back-up, the other a starter, and the last of the three will be traded for a pick in the years to come and we will get that pick back. Panthers are definitely addressing the QB and WR spots. Have to like that plus Eric Norwood is a beast!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually its a damn good value pick. Now we have a really really nice qb competetion at the least and at the most, matt moore will be traded for a skill player

Well with QB how many reps can you really spread around with what, 4 or 5 QB's that are ALL young? Moore, Pike, Clausen, Edwards (though he's supposed to be WR obviously) and possibly whats his name...cantwell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • Yea man, he definitely looked like he belonged in limited action. Smooth athlete with solid vision... sucks to have the setback that he had. 😞 Fully expecting him to start on PUP and then depending on the possibility of a postseason either shut him down until next season or work him back in so that there's fresh legs if needed.
    • He doesn't need to play in 2025. And maybe not 2026 either from what I've read. This is but one peer-reviewed selection:    "A devastating complication of returning to sport following ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is a second ACL injury. Strong evidence now indicates that younger, more active athletes are at particularly high risk for a second ACL injury and this risk is greatest within the first two years following ACLR." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226931/     Regarding your first question... "The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision that affects patient outcomes significantly. Even though there is no consensus in the literature, there are some trends regarding timing of ACLR. Various authors suggest that ACLR be performed at least 3 weeks after injury in order to avoid arthrofibrosis. More important than time alone, objective criteria including perioperative swelling, edema, hyperthermia, and ROM are important indicators of when surgery should be performed." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4004131/#:~:text=The optimal timing of ACLR is an important clinical decision,in order to avoid arthrofibrosis.  
×
×
  • Create New...