Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrett Wilson eyeing Bryce Young


 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

This is why the tanking discussion is so fuggin dumb. Other NFL players aren’t message board losers like we are they want to see winning. They could care less if we pick 6 or 8. Going out with a huge splash this season is massive for us going into the offseason 

I highly doubt our 5 wins are the reason for interest in us. Improvement in bryce and a staff bringing hope/consistency was always going to be the reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CarolinaLivin said:

I highly doubt our 5 wins are the reason for interest in us. Improvement in bryce and a staff bringing hope/consistency was always going to be the reason.

Improvement in Bryce = winning

you aren’t losing many games when your QB goes for 5 TDs, even with our defense. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

What does "He is" even mean and how is it related to the Panthers? Is he replying to something and I can't see it cause I'm not logged into X?

The op said, “maybe Bryce is better than we thought.” Wilson replied, “he is”

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

This is why the tanking discussion is so fuggin dumb. Other NFL players aren’t message board losers like we are they want to see winning. They could care less if we pick 6 or 8. Going out with a huge splash this season is massive for us going into the offseason 

It's almost like you can't grasp that Bryce and we as a team could play better and still lose. That was the story of most of the second half of the season. We just fuged up and actually won two of them.

No one would feel a bit differently if the Falcons had won the toss and gone down the field and scored in OT like we did. Because that was the bottom line. That game was essentially decided by the OT coin toss the way both teams were scoring at will.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Definitely want a guy you can count on for a few games who gives the team a chance to win--I see that perspective.  My view is the backup needs to be competing and developing for 3 years from now, when Bryce may be a mediocre QB asking for $80m.  In addition, his success has been a relatively short stretch; we don't know if old Bryce might return.  I would like to be grooming a backup to be an NFL starter (here or elsewhere) than keeping a guy out of retirement.   But there is benefit to any approach, and what I like probably matters little--Cousins behind RGIII, Brady was drafted when Bledsoe was a big name, The Niners drafted Purdy when they were grooming Lance, etc.  If you sign a 38-year old veteran, you don't develop the backup QB.  Here, we seem to be able to develop QBs (Coach has the rep for developing QBs), so I would like to see us prepare for an uncertain future and use the talents we have on the staff.
    • Bryce is a young qb who can benefit from veteran mind in the room. Given the holes in the roster and needs it seems odd to put draft capital in to qb this year.
    • This doesn't have nearly the same appeal it used to. Teams are actively avoiding "Hard Knocks," especially after the Giants' experience. That said, I would enjoy it a lot.
×
×
  • Create New...