Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Benn or Tate


Ja  Rhule

Who would you pick?  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Who would you pick?

    • Benn
      28
    • Tate
      29


Recommended Posts

Tate.

Benn is bigger and probably a better run blocker which as we know is important for Carolina WRs. However, Tate is a little fighter. Think Munnerlyn except a higher pick and on offense.

The Smith comparisons are also obvious, and I believe that if he keeps a good work ethic he may improve to be a nice Smith/Welkeresque type threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Benn looks like he might be a better option to take consistent advantage of the coverage that Smith gets and a better blocker. However Tate looks like the better playmaker to me. When I see Tate I see alot Steve Smith in him and it kind of makes him too hard to pass up. Plus Tate would be playing the greatest WR ever so naturally Smith will make Tate better. Though Tate does not look as fast as Smitty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I'd really like to know is which of the two has the better brain. That would be what really determines this choice for me were I working with/for the FO.

Though without that knowledge I still lean towards Tate... possibly because I'm a noob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For the silly people that worship her it will be that.  The Coleman 'legend' thing, they did that with another fairly average player that was here and I sort of mocked or questioned the 'legend' status. Instantly caught crap for insulting someone's favorite Panther. So okay, Kurt Coleman is a Legend. 
    • You allow him to compete--you all are talking as if I am proposing making him the starter. Give him a new coach, new weapons, good OL, etc. and see what happens. You are saying, "Well Damn.  It did not work for 3 guys..."  Right now, our C is injured, we lost our top 2 WRs.  Better question:  If you need a QB, Why would you not take a chance on bringing in a QB who was a former first rounder, a good arm, intelligence, mobility, youth, etc.  and see how he does out of NY--with a better OL, better running game, better receivers.  I am not saying give him a 10-year contract, I am saying give him a chance. You act like there is no improvement on offense here--it was a 2 year process, and next year is year 2.  To me, how can you sit there with Bryce and an opportunity to sign a veteran QB on the cheap comes available and you say--"Not us. We're good.  We are waiting for Patrick Mahommes."  Jone's problem is obviously mental--and he has little support.  Why is this so frigging hard to comprehend.  It is called "bottom fishing" and it is better than sitting in the boat.  
    • I think we're going to fall from behind quite early and be forced to abandon the run game.  3 rushes -2 yards 1 catch -10 yards 
×
×
  • Create New...