Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Graham is gone, fo you take Carter?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Have a feeling Jaguars might snatch up Graham at 5. Would you take Carter and then find a space eater for the Dline in 2nd round? They have to address both areas. Linebacker's next.....

Yes or no

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KaijuGato said:

Don’t reach. Get BPA on the board and get outta round 1 with an immediate starter. There are space eaters (DL) in round 2, Deone Walker and Kenneth Grant. 

Where are those 2 projected to go in the draft? I need to check out the top 100 for this draft and try to figure out who may still be there at our 2nd round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine Carter goes before Graham.  Lot of fans think top edge rushers should fit the old 6’6” 285 mold, but that’s not what teams are looking for.

 

listening to the insiders talk and it sounds like Carter is really well liked. 
 

edit: also the “I don’t want Carter thing because he’s still developing, give me Graham” is kind of an odd take given that DT is like the single longest development window in the sport.

Edited by Growl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Carter is there.  We will be submitting the card the second the team ahead of us is picked. 
mo questions

especially now that we know now Evero is back

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CarolinaRideorDie said:

If Carter or Mason Graham are taken before #8, another name to keep an eye on is Walter Nolen, good DT from Mississippi. Maybe trade back to get Nolen. 

I mentioned him earlier. He’ll be a riser throughout this process 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Carter as a prospect. But i also dont want to take him for him to sit behind Wonnum. If we do take him I'd want to trade Wonnum or if we cut him it saves about 8mil i believe and we could spend that towards Safety or Nose tackle.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's not impossible to go from worst to first.  We kept Evero because anyone in there right mind knew our defense was destroyed by injuries, not the scheme.  Evero has been given a plethora of talent between free agency and the draft, not to mention getting DB back. I fully expect our defense to be very good.  I have no reason to think Jones would say something like that unless he truly felt like that.   
    • We would’ve played Florida and lost in the 1st instead of the 3rd round.  Montreal would have been the 8 seed.
    • I can't get behind a purely subjective re-draft as a method of defining "top-10 QB" status. That invites bias based on vibes/hypotheticals and can ignore actual on-field performance. You and others have said that Bryce has to be a top-10 QB to justify the pick. That's a high bar, which I'm not against, but we need a clear, consistent way to measure it. When I bring up metrics that Bryce has registered in the top-10 in like BTT%, P2S ratio, catchable deep ball rate, etc... they're waved off as either irrelevant or the expected baseline performance. Meanwhile, volume stats like passing yards or win-loss records, both of which depend heavily on roster talent, health, and coaching, are treated as definitive. That's where the inconsistency kicks in. If no performance metric ever counts in his favor and the answer is always going to be "he should be doing that," then we're not evaluating him... we're just holding him to a curve he can't win against. If this is really about performance standards, then let's define them. But if it's just about confirming prior takes based on height and weight, then let's call it what is it and stop pretending that this is a football analysis discussion.
×
×
  • Create New...