Bryce Young post benching if it were a full season worth of stats.

[Jackson113.2]

Yall mother fugers are  just itching for him to ruin another season... Jesus H Christ!!!!

[electro's horse]

19 minutes ago, Jackson113.2 said:

If 

If he was 4 inches taller he'd be MVP 

Hypothetical bull poo.

 

It’s not a hypothetical, it’s worse. Hypothetical is a proposition based on suppositions. If x happened, then y.

this is pure revisionism and idiocy. “If we remove 19% of the data then project what’s left to 190% of the original remaining sample we get blah

I’d make a snarky comment about confidence intervals but the OP (and whoever wrote the original tweet) clearly wouldn’t get it. 

[t96]

Incredibly stupid to include the rush stats in with the passing stats, just separate them out and then project. Also let’s see yards per attempt. That passer rating is still bottom of the league. He’s not a good QB, people who still think he’ll be our franchise guy are blind 

[electro's horse]

1 minute ago, t96 said:

Incredibly stupid to include the rush stats in with the passing stats, 

Oh my god I didn’t realize that lmao 

If that’s the case then did they subtract yards lost from sacks (we know the answer to this)

Edited Saturday at 02:26 PM by electro's horse

[*FreeFua*]

It’s nice to finally have a franchise QB again

[Martin]

38 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

It’s not a hypothetical, it’s worse. Hypothetical is a proposition based on suppositions. If x happened, then y.

this is pure revisionism and idiocy. “If we remove 19% of the data then project what’s left to 190% of the original remaining sample we get blah

I’d make a snarky comment about confidence intervals but the OP (and whoever wrote the original tweet) clearly wouldn’t get it. 

Not sure I see the issue with only looking at the numbers after he became the starter again after his benching. He sat, learned etc. and now we want to see if something changed. Hence we will measure the new period post benching. This is common practice and used all the time. I understand you are bitter, but good grief man.

[TLGPanthersFan]

Technically it is 23 TDs to 11 INTs if you remove the rushing TDs and I think about 3500 yards which is still an improvement. 
Even the broadcasts during the 2015 season separated Cams rushing TDs to his throwing TDs. 

[TLGPanthersFan]

8 hours ago, csx said:

OK so running tds included is valid.

Weird to have rushing yds included to make it look better without noting it.

 

It shouldn’t be. Even Cams rushing and passing TDs were separated during the 2015 season. 

[NAS]

17 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Technically it is 23 TDs to 11 INTs if you remove the rushing TDs and I think about 3500 yards which is still an improvement. 
Even the broadcasts during the 2015 season separated Cams rushing TDs to his throwing TDs. 

If you would have told me this would be his second year numbers after the disastrous rookie season I would have taken it as promising sign of development. Of course this means he’s about half a season behind on that trajectory which he will need to make up next year.  I hope he does the things this offseason to ensure a fast start next year when expectations will be higher. 

[The Lobo]

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

[TLGPanthersFan]

12 minutes ago, NAS said:

If you would have told me this would be his second year numbers after the disastrous rookie season I would have taken it as promising sign of development. Of course this means he’s about half a season behind on that trajectory which he will need to make up next year.  I hope he does the things this offseason to ensure a fast start next year when expectations will be higher. 

Agree.

[NAS]

Just now, The Lobo said:

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

Just shows QB development is not a linear path especially when you’re on badly run organizations. Credit to Morgan and Canales for benching him. 

[TLGPanthersFan]

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

If they wouldn’t have benched him, he would have been traded by the deadline. No way would he have improved, that was some of the worst qb play I have ever seen. Something clicked for him when he got benched, saved his career. 

When you are threatened to be fired it can either light a fire under you or you continue continuing as normal because you see nothing you did was wrong. 
Bryce seems to have responded to the benching as the former. 

[The Lobo]

2 minutes ago, NAS said:

Just shows QB development is not a linear path especially when you’re on badly run organizations. Credit to Morgan and Canales for benching him. 

Big time credit, but I still don’t think he’s the guy. Looking forward to see what happens next year if he can take the next step.